Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A85 Topic 8 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A85 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 8
[All HPE6-A85 Questions]

The customer has a requirement to create authorization policies for their users with Windows 10 clients, with a requirement Tor authorizing both device and user credentials within one Radius session.

What would be the correct solution for the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To provide an LACP connection with the maximum available bandwidth, one should configure a link aggregation group (LAG) using all available ports that can be used for data transfer. Since the SFP56 ports are used for stacking, the next best option is to use the 2 SFP28 ports and as many SmartRate 5G (SR5) ports as possible on each switch, which would allow for a 16-member LAG, with 2 SFP28 and 6 SR5 ports on each switch contributing to the LAG.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Chuck
23 days ago
With all these fancy-sounding protocols, I feel like I'm studying for my cybersecurity black belt. But hey, as long as it gets the job done, I'm game!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
28 days ago
I'm just hoping the correct answer isn't Option A, ClearPass 6.9 with EAP-TTLS. That would be like trying to use a screwdriver to hammer in a nail. *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Malcolm
16 days ago
User 1: I think the correct solution is option B, ClearPass 6.9 with EAP-TLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgina
1 months ago
Option C, PEAP, is a solid choice too, but I'm not sure it has the same level of support for both device and user authentication as EAP-TEAP. Guess I'll have to dig into the technical specs to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
Josephine
1 days ago
PEAP is also a good option, but EAP-TEAP might offer better support for both device and user authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
18 days ago
I think EAP-TEAP would be the best choice for that requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassi
1 months ago
The customer is looking for a solution that can handle both device and user credentials, so I think Option D, EAP-TEAP, is the way to go. It's designed specifically for that type of requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Elvis
23 days ago
I agree, EAP-TEAP is specifically designed for that type of requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
1 months ago
Option D, EAP-TEAP, is the best choice for handling both device and user credentials.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Graciela
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B, EAP-TLS, as it's a well-established and secure protocol for both device and user authentication. But I'll double-check the details to make sure it aligns with the customer's needs.
upvoted 0 times
Leonora
9 days ago
User 2: Yeah, EAP-TLS is a solid choice for both device and user credentials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
15 days ago
User 1: I think Option B, EAP-TLS, is the way to go for secure authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Effie
2 months ago
Option D looks promising, as EAP-TEAP supports both device and user authentication in a single Radius session. I'll need to research this further to be sure it meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
2 months ago
But EAP-TTLS supports both device and user credentials in one Radius session, which matches the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe ClearPass 6.9 with EAP-TLS is the correct solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
2 months ago
I think the correct solution is ClearPass 6.9 with EAP-TTLS.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel