New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HPE6-A85 Exam - Topic 7 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A85 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 7
[All HPE6-A85 Questions]

What is the ideal Aruba access switch for a cost-effective connection to 200-380 clients, printers and APs per distribution rack?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The ideal Aruba access switch for a cost-effective connection to 200-380 clients, printers and APs per distribution rack is the Aruba CX 6200. This switch series is a cloud-manageable, stackable access switch series that is ideal for enterprise branch offices and campus networks, as well as SMBs. The CX 6200 series offers the following benefits:

Enterprise-class connectivity: The CX 6200 series supports ACLs, robust QoS, and common protocols such as static and Access OSPF routing.

Power and speed for users and IoT: The CX 6200 series provides built-in 1/10GbE uplinks and 30W to 60W of Class 4 to Class 6 PoE for powering devices such as APs and cameras.

Scalable growth made simple: The CX 6200 series supports Aruba Virtual Switching Framework (VSF) that allows you to quickly grow your network to eight members in a single stack using high-performance built-in 10G SFP ports.

Management flexibility: The CX 6200 series supports a choice of management, including cloud-based and on-prem Central, CLI, switch Web GUI and programmability with AOS-CX operating system, and REST APIs.

The other options are not ideal because:

Aruba CX 6400: This switch series is a high-availability modular switch series that is ideal for versatile edge access to data center deployments. It offers more performance, scalability, and modularity than the CX 6200 series, but it is also more expensive and complex to deploy and manage. It may not be cost-effective for connecting 200-380 clients per distribution rack.

Aruba CX 6300: This switch series is a layer 3 stackable access and aggregation switch series that offers Smart Rate and High Power PoE. It offers more features and performance than the CX 6200 series, but it is also more expensive and may not be necessary for connecting 200-380 clients per distribution rack.

Aruba CX 6000: This switch series is a layer 2 access switch series that offers PoE. It offers less features and performance than the CX 6200 series, and it does not support VSF stacking or routing protocols. It may not be sufficient for connecting 200-380 clients per distribution rack.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ozell
3 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize the 6200 could handle that many devices!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
3 months ago
CX 6000 seems too basic for that many clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
Wait, isn't the CX 6300 better for scalability?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
4 months ago
Definitely agree, the 6200 offers great value!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
4 months ago
I think the Aruba CX 6200 is a solid choice for that range.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
4 months ago
I feel like the CX 6000 is more entry-level, so it might not handle that many clients effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
4 months ago
The CX 6400 seems like overkill for just 200-380 devices, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about the CX series, and I think the CX 6300 was mentioned as a good option for larger deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
5 months ago
I think the Aruba CX 6200 might be the right choice for that number of clients, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The key factors here are the number of clients, printers, and APs, as well as the need for a cost-effective solution. I'll review the features and pricing of each option to determine the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. The client count range is pretty wide, so I'll need to double-check the specs on each of these Aruba models to see which one can best handle that many connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think the Aruba CX 6300 would be the best fit based on the client count range provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
5 months ago
The Aruba CX 6400 seems like overkill for this scenario. I'm leaning towards the Aruba CX 6300 as the most cost-effective option that can still support the required number of connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
5 months ago
Alright, time to put on my analytical hat. This is a multi-part question that's going to require me to really dig into the details and apply my knowledge of consolidation and equity method accounting. I feel confident I can get the right answer, but I'll need to take my time and work through it step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the Partial and Developer sandboxes would be the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel