HP Exam HPE6-A79 Topic 5 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A79 exam

Question #: 56
Topic #: 5

An Aruba WiFi solution for a football stadium includes 2500 APs, two Mobility Masters (MM), and eight Mobility Controllers (MCs). Key requirements are seamless roaming and even distribution of APs and clients, even during a MC failure.

Which MC's deployment option offers seamless roaming, and even AP client distribution among all MCs before and after a MC failure?

Aa two-member HA group in dual mode

Ban eight-member L2-connected cluster

Ctwo four-member L2-connected clusters

Dan eight-member HA group in dual mode

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Cammy at Apr 13, 2024, 04:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A79 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Garry

1 years ago

Yes, that makes sense. We should try option D first and see if it solves the problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nelida

1 years ago

I believe option D is the correct answer, we might need to re-provision one of the APs with a different name.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

1 years ago

I agree with Garry, maybe there is a mistake in how the APs were provisioned.

upvoted 0 times

...

Garry

1 years ago

I think the network administrator should check the configuration of the APs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

1 years ago

I agree with Candidate 2. Modifying the name in the whitelist seems like the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sue

1 years ago

I disagree. I believe the answer is D. Re-provisioning one of the APs with a different name should fix it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Michel

1 years ago

I think the correct answer is A. Creating another AP group might solve the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrinne

1 years ago

Haha, I can just imagine the network admin staring at the logs, scratching their head, and saying 'Wait, what's a whitelist?'. But in all seriousness, I agree that C or D are the most likely solutions here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jessenia

1 years ago

You know, I'm wondering if the network admin just misconfigured the AP group in the first place. Maybe we should be looking at option A - creating a new AP group and re-provisioning one of the APs. That might be the simplest solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emmanuel

1 years ago

Hmm, I'm a little skeptical about option B. Changing the AP's name seems like it might not actually solve the underlying issue. I'd be more inclined to go with C or D, since they seem to directly address the group mismatch problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hershel

1 years ago

I'm not sure I fully understand the whitelist concept in this context. Is this some kind of AP access control list? If so, then yeah, option C does seem like the way to go - update the whitelist to match the AP's group.

upvoted 0 times

Vallie

1 years ago

So, either updating the whitelist or creating a new AP group could be the solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Steffanie

1 years ago

But creating another AP group in the MC's configuration, like in option A, might also solve the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolande

1 years ago

I think option B could work too, by adding new entries with the proper group in the whitelist.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nana

1 years ago

Yes, the whitelist is like an access control list for APs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgina

1 years ago

I agree, the log message is the key here. It seems like the AP is in a different group than the one specified in the whitelist, so we need to either re-provision the AP with a different group or modify the whitelist to match the group the AP is in. Option C sounds like the best approach to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

1 years ago

This is a tricky question. The log message indicates that the AP is in a different group than the one specified in the whitelist, but I'm not sure why that's causing the issue with the SSID propagation. I'm leaning towards option C, but I want to hear what the others think.

upvoted 0 times

...