Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HPE6-A78 Exam - Topic 9 Question 25 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.This company has ArubaOS-Switches. The exhibit shows one access layer switch, Swllcn-2. as an example, but the campus actually has more switches. The company wants to slop any internal users from exploiting ARPWhat Is the proper way to configure the switches to meet these requirements?
D) On Swltch-2, configure static PP-to-MAC bindings for all end-user devices on the network
A) On Switch-1, enable ARP protection globally, and enable ARP protection on ail VLANs.
B) On Switch-2, make ports connected to employee devices trusted ports for ARP protection
C) On Swltch-2, enable DHCP snooping globally and on VLAN 201 before enabling ARP protection

HPE6-A78 Exam - Topic 9 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A78 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 9
[All HPE6-A78 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

This company has ArubaOS-Switches. The exhibit shows one access layer switch, Swllcn-2. as an example, but the campus actually has more switches. The company wants to slop any internal users from exploiting ARP

What Is the proper way to configure the switches to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Alex at Oct 12, 2022, 09:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A78 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Brice
9 months ago
Wait, are we really trusting employee devices? That seems sketchy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
9 months ago
D sounds risky, maintaining static bindings for every device is a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
9 months ago
C is interesting, but isn't DHCP snooping a bit overkill for this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
9 months ago
I disagree, B could work if the trusted ports are set up right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
9 months ago
Option A seems like the best choice for global ARP protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
10 months ago
I vaguely remember something about static IP-to-MAC bindings, but I’m not confident if that’s the most effective solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
10 months ago
I feel like trusted ports could be important, but I can't recall if making them trusted is enough to stop ARP exploitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
10 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar because we practiced enabling DHCP snooping before ARP protection. That might be the right way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
10 months ago
I remember we discussed ARP protection in class, but I'm not sure if enabling it globally is the best approach for all VLANs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Indexes will definitely improve the efficiency of SELECT statements, that's a no-brainer. And they can also reduce invalid data scanning, which is super important for performance. I'm confident those are the two correct answers here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
10 months ago
Content disarm and reconstruction sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it was specifically tied to sender groups or not. Did we cover that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
10 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about digital evidence. I'm pretty confident I know the answer, but I'll double-check the definitions just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
10 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking for two channel type combinations, so I need to look for options that have two relevant channel types. A and B both seem like good choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. The client, the lead auditor, the auditee, and the audit team are all mentioned. I'm not sure which one would initially determine if a third-party audit should be conducted.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel