Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HPE6-A78 Exam - Topic 3 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A78 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 3
[All HPE6-A78 Questions]

Which is a use case for enabling Control Plane Policing on Aruba switches?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Control Plane Policing (CoPP) on Aruba switches is used to mitigate Denial of Service (DoS) attacks on the switch. CoPP allows network administrators to restrict the impact of control plane traffic on the switch's CPU, thereby protecting network stability and integrity. By setting rate limits and specifying allowed traffic types, administrators can prevent malicious or malformed packets from overwhelming the switch's control plane, which could otherwise lead to a DoS condition and potentially disrupt network operations. This use case of CoPP is detailed in Aruba's network management documentation, where best practices and configurations to protect against DoS attacks are discussed.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Levi
4 months ago
A is a solid choice, unauthorized devices are a big risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
4 months ago
I think D is also a good reason, helps with DoS attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
4 months ago
Definitely B, it’s all about securing routing updates!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
4 months ago
I disagree, I feel like C is more about traffic encryption than policing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
5 months ago
Wait, can Control Plane Policing really do that? Sounds too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D since we discussed using Control Plane Policing to protect against DoS attacks in our last review session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
5 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question similar to this before, but I can’t recall if it was about DoS attacks or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
I think option B sounds right because it aligns with what we practiced about securing routing protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
6 months ago
I remember studying Control Plane Policing, but I'm not sure if it's specifically for preventing unauthorized devices from sending updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not super familiar with Aruba switches, so I'll need to think through the use cases carefully. I'm going to take a closer look at the options and see if I can figure out the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of these options. Can Control Plane Policing really be used to encrypt traffic? That doesn't seem right to me, so I'm leaning towards option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
6 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. I think the answer is to prevent unauthorized network devices from sending routing updates, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure it has something to do with security and preventing unauthorized access, but I'm not sure which of these options is the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
6 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different use cases for Control Plane Policing on Aruba switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
7 months ago
But what about option A) to prevent unauthorized network devices from sending routing updates? That could also be a valid use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
8 months ago
I agree with Skye, enabling Control Plane Policing can help protect the switch from DoS attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
8 months ago
D, without a doubt. Protect that control plane at all costs! Though I wonder if the switch has a sense of humor, you know, to lighten the mood during a DoS attack.
upvoted 0 times
Josefa
7 months ago
User 1: D, without a doubt. Protect that control plane at all costs!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
8 months ago
I think the answer is D) to mitigate Denial of Service (Dos) attacks on the switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
9 months ago
Haha, this is a no-brainer. D all the way! Can't have the switch getting overwhelmed by those DoS attacks.
upvoted 0 times
Owen
7 months ago
User 3: It's important to have measures in place to protect against them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
8 months ago
User 2: Absolutely, DoS attacks can really bring down a network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
8 months ago
User 1: D) to mitigate Denial of Service (Dos) attacks on the switch
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ernest
9 months ago
I was thinking B, but D makes more sense. Gotta keep those pesky attackers away from the switch.
upvoted 0 times
Gilma
8 months ago
User 2: D is actually the best option to prevent DoS attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
8 months ago
User 1: I think B is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barbra
9 months ago
Option D is the obvious choice here. Control Plane Policing is a must-have to protect against DoS attacks on the switch.
upvoted 0 times
Mirta
8 months ago
D) to mitigate Denial of Service (Dos) attacks on the switch
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
9 months ago
B) to prevent the switch from accepting routing updates from unauthorized users
upvoted 0 times
...
German
9 months ago
A) to prevent unauthorized network devices from sending routing updates
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel