Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE6-A78 Topic 3 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A78 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 3
[All HPE6-A78 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

This company has ArubaOS-Switches. The exhibit shows one access layer switch, Swllcn-2. as an example, but the campus actually has more switches. The company wants to slop any internal users from exploiting ARP

What Is the proper way to configure the switches to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Thaddeus at Nov 25, 2023, 04:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A78 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lemuel
3 months ago
I'm torn between Options C and D. Maybe I'll just ask the switches to settle this in an ARP battle royale.
upvoted 0 times
Silva
26 days ago
That's a good point. It's always better to have multiple layers of security in place to protect the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
26 days ago
Why not do both? Combining DHCP snooping with static IP-to-MAC bindings could offer the best protection against ARP exploits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
1 months ago
I think Option D might be more effective. Setting up static IP-to-MAC bindings can provide an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
2 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice to me. DHCP snooping can help prevent rogue DHCP servers from causing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dexter
3 months ago
Option A is tempting, but I'm not sure enabling ARP protection on all VLANs is necessary. Probably overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
3 months ago
Option B seems a bit too simplistic. Trusted ports alone won't cut it - we need to enable ARP protection globally.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
3 months ago
I'd go with Option D. Static IP-to-MAC bindings are a rock-solid way to prevent ARP attacks, though it might be a bit more manual.
upvoted 0 times
Susy
1 months ago
Static IP-to-MAC bindings are definitely a strong defense against ARP attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
2 months ago
I agree, Option D is a solid way to secure the network from ARP exploits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
2 months ago
Option D sounds like a good choice. It's a reliable method to prevent ARP attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
2 months ago
User3: It's worth the effort to ensure network security though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
3 months ago
User2: Yeah, static IP-to-MAC bindings are reliable but might require more manual work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
3 months ago
User1: I think Option D is the best choice for preventing ARP attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeannine
3 months ago
Option C sounds like the way to go. DHCP snooping is a key prerequisite for ARP protection to work effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Brittni
1 months ago
Option C sounds like the way to go. DHCP snooping is a key prerequisite for ARP protection to work effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
1 months ago
C) On Switch-2, enable DHCP snooping globally and on VLAN 201 before enabling ARP protection
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
2 months ago
B) On Switch-2, make ports connected to employee devices trusted ports for ARP protection
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
3 months ago
A) On Switch-1, enable ARP protection globally, and enable ARP protection on all VLANs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samira
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think enabling DHCP snooping globally and on VLAN 201 before enabling ARP protection on Switch-2 could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) On Switch-2, configure static IP-to-MAC bindings for all end-user devices on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
4 months ago
I think the answer is A) On Switch-1, enable ARP protection globally, and enable ARP protection on all VLANs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel