Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HPE6-A78 Exam - Topic 3 Question 43 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.This company has ArubaOS-Switches. The exhibit shows one access layer switch, Swllcn-2. as an example, but the campus actually has more switches. The company wants to slop any internal users from exploiting ARPWhat Is the proper way to configure the switches to meet these requirements?
A) On Switch-1, enable ARP protection globally, and enable ARP protection on ail VLANs.
B) On Switch-2, make ports connected to employee devices trusted ports for ARP protection
C) On Swltch-2, enable DHCP snooping globally and on VLAN 201 before enabling ARP protection
D) On Swltch-2, configure static PP-to-MAC bindings for all end-user devices on the network

HPE6-A78 Exam - Topic 3 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A78 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 3
[All HPE6-A78 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

This company has ArubaOS-Switches. The exhibit shows one access layer switch, Swllcn-2. as an example, but the campus actually has more switches. The company wants to slop any internal users from exploiting ARP

What Is the proper way to configure the switches to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Thaddeus at Nov 25, 2023, 04:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A78 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tresa
8 months ago
B could work, but trusting all employee ports? Not so sure about that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
8 months ago
I’m not sure about D, seems like a lot of manual work for static bindings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
8 months ago
Wait, isn't DHCP snooping necessary first? C seems important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
9 months ago
Definitely agree with A, it covers all VLANs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
9 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for ARP protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
9 months ago
I think trusted ports might be the right way to go, but I’m not entirely confident about how that interacts with ARP protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
9 months ago
I feel like configuring static IP-to-MAC bindings could be effective, but it sounds tedious for a large network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
9 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced about DHCP snooping. I think enabling it before ARP protection is crucial, but I can't recall the exact steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
10 months ago
I remember studying ARP protection, but I'm not sure if enabling it globally is the best approach for all VLANs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
10 months ago
This looks straightforward. I'd go with option B - making the ports connected to employee devices trusted for ARP protection. That should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options. I'll need to review the concepts of ARP protection and DHCP snooping to make sure I understand the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
10 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy in mind. I think the key is to enable ARP protection on the right ports and VLANs, and potentially use DHCP snooping to help with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
10 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question mentions ArubaOS-Switches, so I'll need to make sure I understand the specific features and commands for that platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
10 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the best way to configure the switches to prevent ARP exploitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking if the recommended solution meets the goal of ensuring the web apps only allow access through the Front Door instance. I'm not entirely sure, but I'll review the details and make my best guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the vulnerability report to determine the most critical issue and then choose the appropriate tool to validate it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key things I'm looking for are the skills, technologies, and practices related to analyzing past business performance. I'm leaning towards "business analytics" as the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
10 months ago
I'm feeling a bit lost on this one. The options are all related to data classification, but I'm not sure which one is the correct answer. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. I'll need to re-read it a few times and make sure I'm understanding the key details correctly before attempting to answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
1 year ago
I'm torn between Options C and D. Maybe I'll just ask the switches to settle this in an ARP battle royale.
upvoted 0 times
Silva
1 year ago
That's a good point. It's always better to have multiple layers of security in place to protect the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
1 year ago
Why not do both? Combining DHCP snooping with static IP-to-MAC bindings could offer the best protection against ARP exploits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
1 year ago
I think Option D might be more effective. Setting up static IP-to-MAC bindings can provide an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
1 year ago
Option C seems like the best choice to me. DHCP snooping can help prevent rogue DHCP servers from causing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dexter
1 year ago
Option A is tempting, but I'm not sure enabling ARP protection on all VLANs is necessary. Probably overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
1 year ago
Option B seems a bit too simplistic. Trusted ports alone won't cut it - we need to enable ARP protection globally.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
1 year ago
I'd go with Option D. Static IP-to-MAC bindings are a rock-solid way to prevent ARP attacks, though it might be a bit more manual.
upvoted 0 times
Susy
1 year ago
Static IP-to-MAC bindings are definitely a strong defense against ARP attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
1 year ago
I agree, Option D is a solid way to secure the network from ARP exploits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
1 year ago
Option D sounds like a good choice. It's a reliable method to prevent ARP attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
1 year ago
User3: It's worth the effort to ensure network security though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
1 year ago
User2: Yeah, static IP-to-MAC bindings are reliable but might require more manual work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
1 year ago
User1: I think Option D is the best choice for preventing ARP attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeannine
1 year ago
Option C sounds like the way to go. DHCP snooping is a key prerequisite for ARP protection to work effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Brittni
1 year ago
Option C sounds like the way to go. DHCP snooping is a key prerequisite for ARP protection to work effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
1 year ago
C) On Switch-2, enable DHCP snooping globally and on VLAN 201 before enabling ARP protection
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
1 year ago
B) On Switch-2, make ports connected to employee devices trusted ports for ARP protection
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
1 year ago
A) On Switch-1, enable ARP protection globally, and enable ARP protection on all VLANs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samira
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think enabling DHCP snooping globally and on VLAN 201 before enabling ARP protection on Switch-2 could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) On Switch-2, configure static IP-to-MAC bindings for all end-user devices on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) On Switch-1, enable ARP protection globally, and enable ARP protection on all VLANs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel