Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HPE6-A78 Exam - Topic 2 Question 92 Discussion

What is a consideration for implementing wireless containment in response to unauthorized devices discovered by ArubaOS Wireless Intrusion Detection (WIP)?
C) Your company should consider legal implications before you enable automatic containment or implement manual containment.
A) It is best practice to implement automatic containment of unauthorized devices to eliminate the need to locate and remove them.
B) Wireless containment only works against unauthorized wireless devices that connect to your corporate LAN, so it does not offer protection against Interfering APs.
D) Because wireless containment has a lower risk of targeting legitimate neighbors than wired containment, it is recommended in most use cases.

HPE6-A78 Exam - Topic 2 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A78 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 2
[All HPE6-A78 Questions]

What is a consideration for implementing wireless containment in response to unauthorized devices discovered by ArubaOS Wireless Intrusion Detection (WIP)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When implementing wireless containment as a response to unauthorized devices, a company should consider the legal implications. Wireless containment might affect devices that are not part of the company's network and could be considered as a form of interference. This could have legal consequences, and therefore, such actions should be carefully reviewed and ideally should be performed in a targeted and controlled manner, reducing the risk of legal issues.


by Myra at May 11, 2026, 04:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A78 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Marica
4 days ago
I lean towards A. Automatic containment saves time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
10 days ago
I think option C is crucial. Legal issues can be a big deal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
15 days ago
Wait, can containment really target legit devices? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
20 days ago
D) Totally agree, less risk is always better!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
25 days ago
C) Legal implications? That sounds complicated...
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
1 month ago
B) is misleading, it can still help with interference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 month ago
A) is definitely a best practice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
1 month ago
Lower risk of hitting legit neighbors? Sounds good to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
2 months ago
Legal implications are super important to consider before enabling containment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
2 months ago
Wait, does wireless containment really not protect against Interfering APs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
2 months ago
I disagree, manual containment can be safer in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
2 months ago
Automatic containment is definitely a best practice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
2 months ago
I recall that wireless containment is generally safer than wired, so option D could also be a strong contender.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
2 months ago
I think we practiced a question about the effectiveness of containment against interfering APs, which makes me lean towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
3 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like automatic containment could lead to issues if it mistakenly targets legitimate devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
4 months ago
I remember discussing the legal implications of containment in class, so I think option C might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel