HP Exam HPE6-A78 Topic 2 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A78 exam

Question #: 76
Topic #: 2

What is one way a noneypot can be used to launch a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack to wireless clients?

Ait uses a combination or software and hardware to jam the RF band and prevent the client from connecting to any wireless networks

Bit runs an NMap scan on the wireless client to And the clients MAC and IP address. The hacker then connects to another network and spoofs those addresses.

Cit examines wireless clients' probes and broadcasts the SSlDs in the probes, so that wireless clients will connect to it automatically.

Dit uses ARP poisoning to disconnect wireless clients from the legitimate wireless network and force clients to connect to the hacker's wireless network instead.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Delfina at Apr 03, 2025, 03:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A78 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ardella

1 months ago

I'm surprised Option A is even an option. Jamming the RF band? That's just going to piss off everyone and draw a lot of attention. Not exactly the subtle approach I'm looking for.

upvoted 0 times

Annett

4 days ago

I agree, that seems like a risky move. Option D sounds more sneaky and effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freida

10 days ago

Option A) it uses a combination or software and hardware to jam the RF band and prevent the client from connecting to any wireless networks

upvoted 0 times

...

Reyes

1 months ago

Option B sounds like a lot of unnecessary work. Why bother with NMap when you can just use ARP poisoning? It's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

upvoted 0 times

Shawnda

10 days ago

Exactly, ARP poisoning gets the job done without all the extra steps. It's the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

14 days ago

Yeah, ARP poisoning is much simpler and effective. No need to overcomplicate things.

upvoted 0 times

...

Monte

18 days ago

Option B sounds like a lot of unnecessary work. Why bother with NMap when you can just use ARP poisoning? It's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamekia

2 months ago

I'm going to have to go with Option D. It's a tried and true method, and it's probably the most reliable way to pull off a MITM attack on wireless clients.

upvoted 0 times

Lawanda

10 days ago

Using ARP poisoning to force clients to connect to the hacker's network is a sneaky but effective way to carry out a MITM attack.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

22 days ago

I agree, ARP poisoning is a powerful tool for intercepting traffic between wireless clients and the network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dortha

1 months ago

Option D is definitely the way to go. ARP poisoning is a classic method for launching a MITM attack.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyman

2 months ago

Option D seems like the most straightforward approach. ARP poisoning is a classic MITM technique, and it's effective against wireless clients.

upvoted 0 times

Brock

27 days ago

NMap scan to find MAC and IP addresses for spoofing is another clever way to carry out a MITM attack.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreta

1 months ago

True, the combination of software and hardware to jam the RF band can be disruptive as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hollis

1 months ago

But using a noneypot to broadcast SSIDs and trick clients to connect automatically is also sneaky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernadine

2 months ago

I agree, ARP poisoning is a common and effective method for launching a MITM attack.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nettie

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think C could also be a possible way to launch a MITM attack using a noneypot.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

2 months ago

Option C looks interesting, but I'm not sure if that's the best way to launch a MITM attack. I think the attacker would need to do more than just broadcast the SSIDs.

upvoted 0 times

Bambi

28 days ago

B) it runs an NMap scan on the wireless client to And the clients MAC and IP address. The hacker then connects to another network and spoofs those addresses.

upvoted 0 times

...