Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE6-A72 Topic 10 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A72 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 10
[All HPE6-A72 Questions]

Which option correctly describes a two-tier network design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lizette at Mar 17, 2024, 06:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A72 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Celestina
2 months ago
Wait, so if I choose the two-tier network design, does that mean I get to wear two ties to the exam? Asking for a friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
3 months ago
Option D looks good, but I think Option C is a more complete description of a two-tier network design.
upvoted 0 times
Tawna
22 days ago
I see your point, but I still believe Option D is a good choice for a two-tier network design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
23 days ago
Option C seems to provide a more comprehensive approach to a two-tier network design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
1 months ago
I think Option D is also valid, as it divides the network into two layers with the option of routing to the Access Layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
2 months ago
I agree, Option C includes a Distribution Layer to provide Layer 3 features between a routed Core and a Layer 2 Access edge.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maile
3 months ago
Haha, Option A is definitely not correct. Who wants to avoid routing entirely and have Layer 2 across all the layers? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
Ricki
2 months ago
User 3: Option D seems like a good balance between routing and layer separation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
2 months ago
User 2: I think Option C makes the most sense, having a Distribution Layer for Layer 3 features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, Option A sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgeanna
3 months ago
I'm not sure about Option B. Dividing the Core into two layers doesn't quite fit the definition of a two-tier network design.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardine
2 months ago
User 3: I'm not sure about Option B either. Dividing the Core into two layers doesn't sound right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
User 2: I agree with you, Casie. Option C seems to align with the definition of a two-tier network design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
2 months ago
User 1: I think Option C is the correct one. It mentions a Distribution Layer providing Layer 3 features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
3 months ago
User 3: I'm not sure about Option B either. Dividing the Core into two layers seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
3 months ago
User 2: I agree with you. Option C makes more sense for a two-tier network design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
3 months ago
User 1: I think Option C is the correct one. It includes a Distribution Layer to provide Layer 3 features between a routed Core and a Layer 2 Access edge.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Meaghan
4 months ago
Option C seems to be the correct answer. The Distribution Layer acts as an intermediary between the routed Core and the Layer 2 Access edge.
upvoted 0 times
Miesha
2 months ago
Exactly, it helps maintain a structured and efficient network design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
3 months ago
That makes sense, it helps with routing in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
3 months ago
Yes, the Distribution Layer provides Layer 3 features between the Core and Access layers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
3 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Temeka
4 months ago
Why do you think D is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
4 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel