Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 8 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 8
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

An administrator has identified a denial of service attack that is stressing the management processor on the switch. Which actions can be applied to CoPP to mitigate the issue? (Select two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Vallie
2 months ago
I'm with Cornell on this one. C and D are the way to go. Although, I have to admit, the idea of regulating the OOBM port sounds a bit like something out of a spy movie. 'The enemy is in the OOBM, I repeat, the enemy is in the OOBM!'
upvoted 0 times
Clemencia
30 days ago
D) Apply multiple active polices for the classes of traffic
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
1 months ago
That's a good point, regulating the OOBM port does sound like a spy movie scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
1 months ago
C) Regulate traffic from the OOBM Ethernet port
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
2 months ago
A) Set the processing priority
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linwood
3 months ago
Hold up, does anyone else find it funny that we're trying to mitigate a 'denial of service' attack by setting the processing priority? That's like trying to fix a broken leg with a bandaid!
upvoted 0 times
Deangelo
2 months ago
Sueann: Good point. Maybe applying multiple active policies could also spread out the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
2 months ago
User 2: I think regulating traffic from the OOBM Ethernet port could help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
User 1: Yeah, it does seem a bit counterintuitive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristin
3 months ago
B is just weird. Why would we create a policy for the payload of GRE traffic? That doesn't seem relevant to the issue at hand. A and D are the clear winners here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
3 months ago
I think C and D are the way to go. Regulating the OOBM Ethernet port and applying multiple active policies seem like the most logical steps to mitigate the DoS attack.
upvoted 0 times
Annalee
2 months ago
Applying multiple active policies can help manage different classes of traffic effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
2 months ago
Setting the processing priority could also be beneficial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
3 months ago
I agree, regulating the OOBM Ethernet port can help control the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonie
4 months ago
I'm not sure about applying multiple active policies for the classes of traffic. I think focusing on setting the processing priority and regulating specific traffic is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
4 months ago
I agree with Luz. Setting the processing priority will help manage the stress on the management processor, and regulating traffic from the OOBM Ethernet port will help control the flow of traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
4 months ago
I think we should set the processing priority and regulate traffic from the OOBM Ethernet port.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel