Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 7 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 7
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Aruba CX 6300 switch has routes in three different VRFs as per the example above. The user needs to leak routes between VRF Secure and VRF Dev. and also between VRF default and VRF Dev

The customer Is not able to establish routing between directly connected networks 10.100.50.0/24 and 10.102.26.0/24 Which statement is true regarding the routing troubleshooting?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Eun at Apr 04, 2025, 03:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rosalyn
23 days ago
I'm going with option A. Multi-protocol BGP is the way to go for inter-VRF routing on the Aruba CX 6300 switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
27 days ago
Option C can't be right, that would be too easy. Route leaking has to be supported between default and non-default VRFs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the customer is scratching their head trying to figure this out. Gotta love those tricky networking questions!
upvoted 0 times
Donette
2 days ago
I think the answer might be A) Multi-protocol BGP routing needs to be defined for route leaking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
23 days ago
Yeah, networking can be a real puzzle sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marvel
1 months ago
Hmm, that's interesting. I'll have to look into it further to understand why that might be the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Route leaking between default and non-default VRFs is supported with Aruba CX 8400.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Multi-protocol BGP routing needs to be defined for route leaking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
2 months ago
Option D sounds like the right answer to me. Route leaking between default and non-default VRFs is supported on the Aruba CX 8400 switch.
upvoted 0 times
Cristy
22 days ago
Yes, that's correct. The Aruba CX 8400 switch allows route leaking between default and non-default VRFs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 months ago
Option D sounds like the right answer to me. Route leaking between default and non-default VRFs is supported on the Aruba CX 8400 switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Estrella
2 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer. Multi-protocol BGP is required for route leaking between VRFs.
upvoted 0 times
Nicolette
4 days ago
User1: I'm not sure, but I think option A is more likely the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
5 days ago
User3: But what about option D? Does Aruba CX 8400 support route leaking between default and non-default VRFs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
6 days ago
User2: I agree, Multi-protocol BGP is needed for route leaking between VRFs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
9 days ago
User1: I think option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
15 days ago
User1: Option D is not correct, route leaking between default and non-default VRFs is supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
19 days ago
User3: But what about option D? It mentions Aruba CX 8400.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
28 days ago
User2: I agree, Multi-protocol BGP is needed for route leaking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
1 months ago
User1: I think option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel