Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 6 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 6
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

You have created an OSPF neighbor configuration with ArubaOS-CX 8320 VSX and a third-party switch The OSPF peering falls. In the event togs you see the following entries.

2020-10-28:03:14 20.371489|hpe-routlng|LOG_WARN|AMM|1/5jOSPFV2|OSPFV2iOSPF 268698624 Packet received with unexpected authentication type 2020-10-28:03:14.20.371503|hpe-routing|LOG_WARN|AMM|1/5|OSPFV2|OSPFV2|Expected authentication type = 0

Which statement is true about the above events?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jimmie
2 days ago
Hmm, maybe the ArubaOS-CX switch does not expect authentication with OSPF then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
3 days ago
I disagree, I believe the third-party switch should be configured with MD5 authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
3 days ago
Haha, the ArubaOS-CX switch is like a picky eater - it only likes its authentication a certain way! Time to update the third-party switch's menu to keep the OSPF neighbors happy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
4 days ago
Looks like the third-party switch needs to be configured with MD5 authentication to match the ArubaOS-CX switch's requirements. That's the only way this OSPF peering is going to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
7 days ago
I think the ArubaOS-CX switch requires plain-text authentication with OSPF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
7 days ago
The ArubaOS-CX switch seems to be expecting a different authentication type than the third-party switch is using. The logs indicate that it's seeing an unexpected authentication type 2, when it expects type 0 (no authentication).
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel