Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 4 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 4
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

A customer would like to utilize some ArubaOS-CX 6300F switches to perform OSPF routing.

With the ports set up as routed ports, and default parameters for OSPF, which action is the simplest way to allow the fastest communication...

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Elli at Feb 13, 2024, 07:28 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Arthur
2 months ago
The fastest communication? I thought we were optimizing for the slowest, so the rest of us can catch up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
3 months ago
Equal-cost multi-path routing? More like 'equal-cost multi-pain' if you ask me. I'll stick with the default settings, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
Annamae
1 months ago
Setting the OSPF reference bandwidth to 10 or higher could be a good option for faster communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
1 months ago
Yeah, no need to complicate things if default settings work fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
2 months ago
I think setting the OSPF cost parameters on every interface on every switch might be too much work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
2 months ago
I agree, sticking with default settings is usually the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Troy
3 months ago
Option B is too much work! Who wants to manually set the OSPF cost on every interface? I'm going with the simplest solution, option C.
upvoted 0 times
Tawna
2 months ago
User 4: Option C it is, keeping it simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
2 months ago
User 3: I think I'll go with option C as well, no need for extra work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
3 months ago
User 2: Yeah, option C seems like the easiest way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, setting OSPF cost on every interface sounds like a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joesph
3 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Setting the OSPF reference bandwidth to 10 or higher will ensure that the links are utilized properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
4 months ago
But wouldn't setting the OSPF reference bandwidth to 10 or higher also help with faster communication?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
4 months ago
Option C seems correct. With the ports set up as routed ports and default OSPF parameters, no additional action is required to enable the fastest communication.
upvoted 0 times
Ronnie
3 months ago
User 4: Good to know, thanks for clarifying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
3 months ago
User 3: That makes sense, default parameters should be sufficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
3 months ago
User 2: Agreed, no additional action is required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
3 months ago
User 1: Option C seems correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rickie
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe utilizing Equal-cost multi-path routing would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
4 months ago
I think setting OSPF cost parameters on every interface is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel