Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 6 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 6
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

The customer is already using Aruba Gateway and third-party L2 switches New ArubaOS CX 6300 switches have been deployed for R&D. which have a requirement for user profiling and tunneled traffic between ArubaOS CX 6300 and Aruba Gateway

What is required for this configuration to apply QoS user-based rules for the R&D client traffic?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Barney at Jul 15, 2024, 11:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Mariann
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but option B also seems plausible as it involves defining QoS in the user role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
10 months ago
I agree with Lynsey, applying a QoS rule to the client port makes sense for user-based rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
10 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of QoS between Aruba and third-party gear. Option B is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Harris
10 months ago
That makes sense, it will help with user profiling and tunneled traffic between the switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
10 months ago
Agreed, applying a port-access policy with QoS in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
10 months ago
I think we should go with option B for QoS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jarod
10 months ago
Option B, for sure. Applying a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the Aruba CX6300 switch seems like the most logical approach here.
upvoted 0 times
Denae
9 months ago
Agreed. It's the best way to ensure user-based rules for the R&D client traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
9 months ago
Definitely. It will help prioritize and manage the traffic effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
9 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to have QoS defined in the user role for R&D client traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
10 months ago
Option B, for sure. Applying a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the Aruba CX6300 switch seems like the most logical approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryann
10 months ago
Haha, manually prioritizing IP protocol 47 traffic? That's like trying to fix a leaky faucet with duct tape. Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
11 months ago
Wait, we need to apply QoS rules on the Aruba CX 6300 switches, not the third-party switches. Definitely option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
11 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our understanding of QoS configurations between Aruba and third-party devices. I think option B is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Clorinda
9 months ago
That sounds right, it's important to configure QoS properly for user-based rules in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
9 months ago
I agree, applying a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
9 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
9 months ago
Option D might be a good choice if we need to create a QoS policy specifically for the UBT-client-VLAN traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
10 months ago
I think option A could also work by classifying traffic before it is tunneled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
10 months ago
I agree, option B makes the most sense for applying QoS rules for the R&D client traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynsey
11 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer because we need to classify traffic before tunneling.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel