HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 3 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam

Question #: 44
Topic #: 3

(Scenarios may contain multiple errors which may or may not Impact the solution > Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer has attempted to configure two pairs of switches in the referenced configuration it is required to implement VSX keep-alive at the aggregation layer.

The ports of the ArubaOS-CS 8325 switches used for Agg01 and Agg02 are populated as follows:

The configuration of switch AGG01 includes:

VSX keep-alive is not working. Which modification should you make lo resolve the error condition?

AEdit interface 1/1/48, adding the command 'vpn-instance KA'

BModify the Interface lag 2 command, removing 'multi-chassis'

CModify the Keepalive peer 192.168.20.2 source 192 168.20.1 command, adding 'vrf KA'

DEdit the vsx-sync command, adding 'keep-alive'

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Chantay at Sep 07, 2024, 03:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Julene

3 months ago

I bet the engineer who made this config was trying to 'lag' behind on their work. Option C is the fix for this 'lag-tastic' situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mila

3 months ago

Wait, so they didn't even set the VRF for the keep-alive? Talk about a 'multi-chassis' mistake! C is definitely the correct answer here.

upvoted 0 times

Lemuel

2 months ago

Derick: Definitely, option C will fix the error condition and get the VSX keep-alive working properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

2 months ago

User 2: Agreed, that's a crucial step that was missed. C is the way to go for sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mickie

2 months ago

User 1: Yeah, not setting the VRF for the keep-alive was a big oversight.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryann

3 months ago

Haha, I bet the engineer who set this up was 'keeping-alive' their hopes that it would work without the right VRF. Option C is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Cordelia

2 months ago

The engineer should have paid more attention to the VRF configuration. Option C is the correct modification to make for VSX keep-alive to work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tasia

3 months ago

I agree, the VRF was probably the missing piece here. Option C is the best solution to resolve the error condition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Della

3 months ago

Option C is definitely the right choice. Adding 'vrf KA' to the Keepalive peer command should fix the VSX keep-alive issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leeann

3 months ago

Hmm, this looks tricky. I'm leaning towards option C as well, since the keep-alive needs to be configured in the correct VRF.

upvoted 0 times

Reena

1 months ago

Great, let's make the modification and see if that resolves the VSX keep-alive issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nancey

1 months ago

Let's go with option C then, it seems to be the most logical choice for fixing the VSX keep-alive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rasheeda

2 months ago

I agree, the VRF KA is important for the keep-alive to work properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irma

3 months ago

I think option C is the correct one, it mentions adding the VRF KA for the keep-alive configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christa

4 months ago

Hmm, I see your point. Let's review the options again.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valda

4 months ago

The issue seems to be with the VSX keep-alive configuration. I think the correct answer is C, as it indicates the need to add the 'vrf KA' parameter to the Keepalive peer command.

upvoted 0 times