New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HPE2-T37 Exam - Topic 6 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE2-T37 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 6
[All HPE2-T37 Questions]

Which statement about M-LAG setup is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Solange at Feb 28, 2023, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE2-T37 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Elizabeth
4 months ago
Definitely agree with A, it's a solid setup!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
4 months ago
Wait, D seems off, how can it be auto for Synergy but manual for BladeSystem?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
4 months ago
C sounds right, sFLOW and M-LAG don't mix well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
4 months ago
I think B is misleading, BladeSystem can do more than just single-homed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
4 months ago
A is correct, M-LAG with IRF is a game changer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
5 months ago
I’m pretty sure M-LAG needs manual configuration for BladeSystem, but I thought it was automatic for Synergy. That might be option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
5 months ago
I feel like option B sounds familiar, but I can't remember if HPE Synergy really supports both single-homed and multi-homed configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
5 months ago
I think I saw a practice question about M-LAG and IRF, but I can't recall if it was about aggregation or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
5 months ago
I remember studying M-LAG setups, but I'm not entirely sure about the specifics for HPE Synergy versus BladeSystem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. The International Date Line is an imaginary line, but I'm not sure if it's specifically described as passing through the poles. I might need to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
5 months ago
Okay, let me walk through this step-by-step. The `set` is initialized with the array of integers, which are then converted to `B` objects. The `operator<` overload ensures the `set` stores them in sorted order. The `sort` call doesn't change anything, and the `for_each` loop just prints them out. I think I've got it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
5 months ago
I think the answer might be parametric analysis, but I'm not completely sure about the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
5 months ago
Wait, didn't we cover something similar in a practice question? It sounds like a threat where one service can compromise another.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
9 months ago
I bet the guy who named 'M-LAG' was just trying to sound fancy. 'Multi-Link Aggregation Group' - sounds like something straight out of a networking textbook!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
9 months ago
D? Seriously? Who wants to manually configure M-LAG on BladeSystem when Synergy can do it automatically. Lazy engineers, I tell ya!
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
8 months ago
D) M-LAG has to be defined manually for HPE BladeSystem, but it is automatically configured for HPE Synergy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
8 months ago
C) sFLOW cannot be enabled if M-LAG is configured between HPE Synergy Virtual Connect modules in the same frame.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
8 months ago
B) M-LAG for HPE Synergy can be either single-homed or multi-homed, while for HPE BladeSystem only single-homed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
8 months ago
A) When combined with IRF, M-LAG will allow you to aggregate ports coming from clustered HPE Synergy Virtual Connect modules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dell
10 months ago
C is not true, why would sFLOW be disabled just because M-LAG is configured? Seems like a strange limitation.
upvoted 0 times
Elenore
8 months ago
We should look into it further to understand the reasoning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
8 months ago
Maybe there's a technical reason behind it that we're not aware of.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
8 months ago
I agree, it does seem like a strange limitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blondell
10 months ago
Hmm, I thought M-LAG was just for BladeSystem. Good to know it works with Synergy too!
upvoted 0 times
Marsha
8 months ago
Brittni: And for BladeSystem, it's only single-homed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
9 months ago
User 2: That's right! It can be single-homed or multi-homed for Synergy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
9 months ago
User 1: Yes, M-LAG can also be used with Synergy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audry
10 months ago
Option B is correct. M-LAG can be either single-homed or multi-homed for HPE Synergy, but only single-homed for HPE BladeSystem.
upvoted 0 times
Erasmo
9 months ago
Yes, it's important to understand the differences in M-LAG setup for different systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
9 months ago
That's interesting, I didn't know that. Thanks for sharing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
9 months ago
I agree, option B is correct. M-LAG can be single-homed or multi-homed for HPE Synergy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colette
10 months ago
Interesting point, but I still think A is the right answer based on the setup requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B. M-LAG for HPE Synergy can be single-homed or multi-homed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
11 months ago
I think the answer is A, because M-LAG combined with IRF allows for port aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel