Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE0-S59 Topic 9 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-S59 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 9
[All HPE0-S59 Questions]

Your customer has a logical enclosure configured using a angle HPE Synergy frame with the following configuration

- two HPE Virtual Connect SE 100Gb F32 Modules for Synergy

- two HPE Synergy Virtual Connect SE 32Gb FC Modules -12 HPE Synergy 480 Gen10 Plus compute nodes with appropriate mezzanine cards

They plan to add a new HPE Synergy frame to an existing logical enclosure with the following configuration

- two HPE Synergy Virtual Connect SE 32Gb FC Modules

- two HPE Synergy 20Gb interconnect Link Modules

- Eight HPE Synergy 480 Gen 10 Plus compute nodes with appropriate mezzanine cards

Which statement about the planned configuration change is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Chauncey
23 days ago
Wait, do we need to add a license for an extended logical enclosure? That's like saying you need a license to add more RAM to your computer. *chuckles* Option C is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
27 days ago
Stacking the HPE Synergy Virtual Connect SE 32Gb FC Modules? That's an interesting idea, but I don't think that's required here. Option D seems a bit off the mark.
upvoted 0 times
Marti
18 hours ago
I think we should consider option A instead, to balance the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
11 days ago
I agree, option D doesn't seem necessary in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Matthew
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced that the compute modules need to be moved between frames. The configuration seems balanced already. Option A doesn't seem necessary.
upvoted 0 times
Alesia
20 hours ago
We could also look into stacking the HPE Synergy Virtual Connect SE 32Gb FC Modules from both frames.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
11 days ago
I think we should consider option C and add a license for an extended logical enclosure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
30 days ago
I agree, the configuration seems balanced already.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimberlie
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't the two HPE Synergy 20Gb interconnect Link Modules need to be replaced with the 50Gb option to support the additional compute nodes? Option B seems more plausible to me.
upvoted 0 times
Sarah
23 days ago
But do you think we also need to move some compute modules to balance the configuration?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
30 days ago
I think you're right. Upgrading to the 50Gb option would make sense for the additional compute nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalyn
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) A license for an extended logical enclosure must be added to HPE OneView through GUI makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. The logical enclosure configuration is being expanded, so a license for an extended logical enclosure will need to be added through the HPE OneView GUI.
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
28 days ago
D) The HPE Synergy virtual Connect SE 32Gb FC Modules from both frames should be stacked
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
1 months ago
C) A license for an extended logical enclosure must be added to HPE OneView through GUI
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
1 months ago
B) The two HPE Synergy 20Gb interconnect Link Modules must be replace with the 50Gb option
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
1 months ago
A) Four compute modules must be moved to the second frame to balance the configuration
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stevie
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) The HPE Synergy virtual Connect SE 32Gb FC Modules from both frames should be stacked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Four compute modules must be moved to the second frame to balance the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel