Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HPE0-J68 Exam - Topic 9 Question 71 Discussion

Which statement is correct when comparing functionalities of the AF and HF series in the Nimble storage portfolio? (Choose Two)
B) >99.9999% availability is measured and guaranteed for AF and HF series arrays. and C) HF series has a dedicated read cache and AF series does not have a dedicated reach cache.
A) Zero Copy Clones are a unique feature of All-Flash arrays within the Nimble Portfolio.
D) HF series supports storage snapshots and replication using Veeam Backup & Replication, HF and AF series support storage snapshots only

HPE0-J68 Exam - Topic 9 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-J68 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 9
[All HPE0-J68 Questions]

Which statement is correct when comparing functionalities of the AF and HF series in the Nimble storage portfolio? (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Doretha at Apr 22, 2024, 09:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE0-J68 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Camellia
8 months ago
Wait, are you sure about the Veeam support? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
8 months ago
I disagree, HF series has a read cache too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
8 months ago
>99.9999% availability is impressive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
9 months ago
I thought Zero Copy Clones were for both series?
upvoted 0 times
...
German
9 months ago
A and B are definitely correct!
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
9 months ago
I vaguely remember that HF series supports Veeam for snapshots, but I thought both series could do snapshots. This one's tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
9 months ago
I practiced a question about the read cache before, and I feel like the HF series does have a dedicated read cache, but I'm not 100% sure about the AF series.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
9 months ago
I think Zero Copy Clones are specific to the AF series, but I can't recall if HF has something similar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
10 months ago
I remember studying that both AF and HF series have high availability, but I'm not sure if it's the same percentage for both.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
10 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the read cache feature. I'll need to double-check the technical specifications to be sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
10 months ago
This is a good opportunity to showcase my knowledge of the Nimble storage portfolio. I'm confident I can identify the two correct statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
10 months ago
The availability guarantee and snapshot/replication support are good things to focus on. I'll make sure I understand those key differences between the two series.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think I remember that the AF series has some unique features like zero-copy clones, but I'm not sure about the availability guarantee or the read cache differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the differences between the AF and HF series to determine which statements are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
10 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. If the OLT or OLT uplink fails, the Type C dual home protection can be reversed to another OLT, so the answer must be True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
10 months ago
I'm feeling confident about this one. The utility bar and record highlights panel are the two areas mentioned in the question where Open CTI features can be made available in a Lightning App. I'll select A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 years ago
I think the difference in read cache might be a distinguishing factor between AF and HF series' functionalities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 years ago
Option C seems plausible. HF series having a dedicated read cache makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
2 years ago
I heard that both AF and HF series guarantee high availability, but I'm not sure about the exact percentage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 years ago
I'm not so sure about option B. Does anyone know about the availability for AF and HF series?
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 years ago
I agree with That's a key feature of AF series.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
2 years ago
I think option A is correct about Zero Copy Clones being unique to All-Flash arrays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
2 years ago
Yes, HF series supports it while both HF and AF series support storage snapshots only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
2 years ago
So, for snapshots and replication, is it true that the HF series supports Veeam Backup & Replication?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 years ago
Yes, that's correct. The AF series does not have a dedicated read cache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
2 years ago
I agree with that. What about option C, does the HF series really have a dedicated read cache?
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
2 years ago
I think option A is correct, Zero Copy Clones are unique to All-Flash arrays.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel