When performing r2 assessments, any added compliance factors should be considered before marking a requirement statement "N/A".
Marking a requirement statement ''Not Applicable (N/A)'' requires careful justification. In r2 assessments, compliance factors such as HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, or state-specific laws may trigger requirements that would not otherwise apply. Therefore, an assessor must verify that all compliance factors have been considered before permitting an N/A designation. For example, a requirement related to cardholder data might seem irrelevant unless PCI-DSS was selected as a compliance factor; in that case, it becomes mandatory. HITRUST QA scrutinizes N/A markings to ensure they are not misused to exclude applicable requirements. Incorrect use of N/A may result in CAPs or QA rejection. Thus, compliance factors must always be reviewed first to confirm whether the requirement is truly outside scope.
Rutha
3 days agoGayla
8 days agoDona
14 days agoNelida
19 days agoJaney
24 days agoJacqueline
29 days agoVal
1 month agoStevie
1 month agoLashawnda
1 month agoTerina
2 months agoWilburn
2 months agoBobbye
2 months ago