Discuss HITRUST CCSFP Exam Topic 1 Question 11

When partially inheriting a requirement statement score from an external cloud service provider, the weighting applied to the score is determined primarily by the assessed entity and the service provider. [0190]

ATrue

BFalse

Suggested Answer: B

The weighting of partially inherited scores in HITRUST is determined by HITRUST's methodology, not by mutual agreement between the assessed entity and service provider.

Organizations may identify which portions of a requirement are inherited vs. managed internally, but the actual scoring mechanics are controlled by the HITRUST CSF Assurance methodology to ensure consistency.

Extract Reference (HITRUST CSF Inheritance Guidance [0190]):

Weighting for partial inheritance is calculated using HITRUST's scoring methodology, not negotiated between entities.

Get Premium CCSFP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

26 comments · newest first

Vernell 1 month ago

I see your point, but I still think A) True is more accurate. It's a joint effort.

Casey 1 month ago

I'm leaning towards B) False. The provider shouldn't have too much influence.

Nida 2 months ago

I agree, A) True. Collaboration is key in these assessments.

Emerson 2 months ago

I think it's A) True. Makes sense for both parties to weigh in.

Eladia 2 months ago

False could be right too. Consistency is key.

Suzi 2 months ago

True makes sense. Providers influence the score.

Blondell 2 months ago

I disagree, it's False. Weighting should be standard.

Cortney 2 months ago

I think it's True. The assessed entity matters.

Sylvia 3 months ago

I feel A) True is right. The assessed entity needs input from the provider.

Bettyann 3 months ago

I'm leaning towards B) False. The provider shouldn't dictate the weight.

Dalene 3 months ago

I agree, A) True. Collaboration is key in these assessments.

Chantell 3 months ago

I think it's A) True. Makes sense to weigh it based on both parties.

Avery 3 months ago

Really? That seems a bit subjective to me.

Shelba 4 months ago

True, that's how it works in most cases.

Carin 5 months ago

Wait, so the score can change based on who assesses it?

Kristeen 5 months ago

I disagree, I think it should be more standardized.

Vivan 5 months ago

Sounds about right, the entity and provider should weigh in.

Tashia 6 months ago

True, it makes sense for both parties to weigh in.

Ruthann 6 months ago

Really? That seems a bit subjective to me.

Paola 6 months ago

Wait, so the score can change based on who’s assessing?

Stevie 6 months ago

I disagree, the service provider should have more influence.

Lucy 6 months ago

Sounds about right, the assessed entity should have a say.

Margot 6 months ago

This sounds familiar, but I can't recall the specifics. I might go with A since it seems to align with what we discussed in class.

Dylan 7 months ago

I'm leaning towards B because I feel like the service provider shouldn't have all the control over the weighting.

Ranee 7 months ago

I remember a practice question about scoring requirements, and it mentioned the importance of both parties involved. Could be A?

Stefanie 7 months ago

I think the answer might be A, but I'm not entirely sure how the weighting works in this context.

HITRUST CCSFP Exam - Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion