MENU
You want to manage a slowly changing dimension as type II.
Which step in PDI should you use to accomplish this task.
Suggested Answer: B, D
Get Premium HCE-5920 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
VA
Vallie
10 months ago
I agree, 'Dimension Lookup/update' is the right choice!
RO
Royal
11 months ago
Really? I’m surprised it’s not the 'Table output step'.
EF
Effie
11 months ago
No way, it's the 'Combination lookup/update' step for sure!
UL
Ula
11 months ago
I thought it was the 'Shared Dimension' step?
CL
Claudio
11 months ago
Definitely the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step!
AL
Alline
12 months ago
The 'Table output step' seems less likely to be the answer, but I guess it could still play a role in the overall process.
NI
Nickolas
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the 'Combination lookup/update' step. I feel like it could be relevant, but I can't recall the specifics.
VA
Valentin
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think the 'Shared Dimension' step was mentioned as a way to handle type II changes.
PA
Paola
1 year ago
I think the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step might be the right choice for managing slowly changing dimensions, but I'm not entirely sure.
SE
Serina
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The 'Dimension Lookup/update' step is the one you use to manage a slowly changing dimension as type II. I'm confident that's the right answer.
EM
Emerson
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure on this one. I know we covered slowly changing dimensions, but I can't quite recall which specific step is used for that. I'll have to review my notes before answering.
DO
Domonique
1 year ago
Okay, let me see... I think the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step might be the right choice here, since that's used for slowly changing dimensions. But I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
BE
Bernardo
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different steps in PDI and how they relate to managing a slowly changing dimension.
BA
Barbra
1 year ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. The 'Dimension Lookup/update' step is definitely the way to go for managing a type II slowly changing dimension.
PE
Pete
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the Html.Sitecore().Field() method is used for rendering fields, but I'm not sure which ones are considered complex.
SA
Santos
1 year ago
I'm feeling a little unsure about this one. I know the question is about testing controls, but I'm not totally clear on the differences between the answer choices. I might need to review my notes before selecting an answer.
JE
Jestine
1 year ago
I'm a little confused on this one. I know option premiums are related to the underlying stock, but I'm not sure of the specifics. Guess I'll have to think it through carefully.
HA
Haydee
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll have to think it through carefully.
MA
Maryann
1 year ago
Forget the exam, I'm just gonna ask the wizard from the Emerald City for his advice on this one. I bet he knows a thing or two about managing slowly changing dimensions.
JE
Jennie
1 year ago
D) The 'Table output step
DO
Dominque
1 year ago
A) The 'Shared Dimension' step
RO
Ronny
1 year ago
C) The 'Combination lookup/update' step
KA
Kati
1 year ago
B) The 'Dimension Lookup/update' step
AN
An
1 year ago
The 'Shared Dimension' step? Really? I didn't even know that was a thing. Is that like the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step's nerdy cousin or something?
SA
Sarina
1 year ago
C) The 'Combination lookup/update' step
AL
Allene
1 year ago
B) The 'Dimension Lookup/update' step
GR
Gracie
1 year ago
A) The 'Shared Dimension' step
CE
Cecily
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step. It just feels like the most logical choice for this task. Although, I do like a good 'Table output' step every now and then, just to keep things interesting.
NO
Noelia
1 year ago
User 3: I prefer the 'Table output' step for some variety in my tasks.
JE
Jesusita
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, it seems like the most logical choice for managing a slowly changing dimension as type II.
MA
Mabel
1 year ago
User 1: I think the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step is the way to go.
MA
Marisha
1 year ago
Hmm, the 'Combination lookup/update' step seems like it could work too. Maybe I should double-check the documentation on that one.
EL
Elfriede
1 year ago
Yeah, it's always best to make sure you're using the right step for the job.
GE
Geoffrey
1 year ago
The 'Combination lookup/update' step could also work, but it's always good to double-check the documentation.
IR
Irma
1 year ago
I agree, the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step is specifically designed for that task.
DE
Denise
1 year ago
I think the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step is the best option for managing a slowly changing dimension as type II.
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step is the way to go. That sounds like the perfect tool for managing slowly changing dimensions.
MI
Micheal
1 year ago
Yes, the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step is specifically designed for handling type II slowly changing dimensions.
TO
Tora
1 year ago
I agree, the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step is the best choice for managing slowly changing dimensions.
SU
Sue
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think the 'Combination lookup/update' step could also be used for managing type II SCDs.
TA
Tambra
2 years ago
I agree with Aja. The 'Dimension Lookup/update' step is designed specifically for handling type II SCDs.
AJ
Aja
2 years ago
I think we should use the 'Dimension Lookup/update' step for managing a type II slowly changing dimension.