New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Hitachi Vantara HCE-3700 Exam - Topic 6 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Hitachi Vantara's HCE-3700 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 6
[All HCE-3700 Questions]

A customer plans to migrate an interactive application from a VSP to VSP G1000. The application has

consistent access across all its capacity with low hit rates and no particularly high I/O access areas. The

application latency must be less or equal to 1.5 ms.

Which configuration do you recommend to satisfy the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Sylvia at May 07, 2022, 12:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HCE-3700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lourdes
4 months ago
D is interesting, but not sure if it's necessary for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
4 months ago
C seems off, NL-SAS won't cut it for low latency needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure FMD drives can handle that latency?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
4 months ago
Definitely agree with B, FMD drives are solid for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
5 months ago
I think option B is the best choice for low latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
5 months ago
I vaguely remember that NL-SAS drives are generally slower, so I doubt option C would meet the latency requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
5 months ago
I feel like the HDP pool with FMD drives might be the right answer since it focuses on performance, but I’m a bit uncertain about the latency requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
5 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where HDT pools were recommended for consistent access, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
5 months ago
I remember that for low latency, FMD drives are usually a good choice, but I'm not sure if an HDP pool is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
5 months ago
I've got this! The PRIMARY KEY is on ORDER_ID, and the UNIQUE constraint is on SERIAL_NO. Those are the two columns that will have indexes created automatically. I'm feeling good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd focus on looking at the total IOPS and the array group utilization to see if the pool is configured appropriately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions a "unique solution" for each question, so I'm not sure if the Call Quality Dashboard is the only way to get the packet loss data. I'll need to double-check the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel