New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Hitachi Vantara HCE-3700 Exam - Topic 3 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Hitachi Vantara's HCE-3700 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 3
[All HCE-3700 Questions]

Your customer has a VSP G1000 with an HDT pool with two tiers (SAS 15K and SAS 10K). The response

times have increased over time to an unacceptable level. They want to add a flash tier and they ask you if this solution will be appropriate.

Which tool should you use to satisfy the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Odelia
4 months ago
Adding a flash tier sounds good, but will it really fix the response times?
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
4 months ago
I heard Universal Volume Manager could also help, but not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure that’s the best option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
4 months ago
Totally agree, it optimizes performance well!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
5 months ago
I think Hitachi Tiered Storage Manager is the way to go for adding a flash tier.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards the Hitachi Tiered Storage Manager too, but I just hope I’m not confusing it with the Server Priority Manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to optimize performance, and I feel like Universal Volume Manager was mentioned, but I don't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
5 months ago
I think it might be the Hitachi Tiered Storage Manager since it deals with tiering, but I could be mixing it up with another tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
5 months ago
I remember studying about the different Hitachi tools, but I'm not entirely sure which one specifically handles adding a flash tier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy in mind. I'll start by identifying the key VPNs and their connectivity requirements, then match that to the configuration options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. ABC is more detailed and accurate in allocating overhead costs compared to absorption costing, so I'm going to go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
5 months ago
This question looks straightforward, I think I can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel