Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HIPAA HIO-201 Exam - Topic 3 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for HIPAA's HIO-201 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 3
[All HIO-201 Questions]

A doctor is sending a patient's lab work to a lab That is an external business partner. The lab and the doctor's staff are all trained on the doctor's Privacy Practices. The doctor has a signed Notice from the patient, In order to use or disclose PHI, the lab MUST.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Denny
4 months ago
Just to clarify, the doctor’s Notice covers this situation, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
4 months ago
I thought they always needed a separate consent form.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure they don’t need a specific authorization?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
5 months ago
Totally agree, B is the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
5 months ago
The lab doesn't need a new Notice since the doctor’s is valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
5 months ago
I think the answer is B, but I’m a bit hesitant because I remember something about needing to check if the Notice has expired.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
5 months ago
I feel like the lab should just be able to proceed since they’re trained on the doctor's practices, but I can't recall if they need to verify anything first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
5 months ago
I remember a practice question where the lab had to get specific authorization from the patient. I wonder if that's the case here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
5 months ago
I think the lab might need to do something more than just rely on the doctor's Notice of Privacy Practices, but I'm not sure what that is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
5 months ago
I think the answer is B - the lab doesn't need to do anything additional since the doctor already has the patient's signed notice. The question is testing our knowledge of HIPAA requirements for sharing PHI with business partners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Does the lab need to do something specific, or is the doctor's notice sufficient? I'll have to re-read this a few times to make sure I understand it properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key here is that the doctor already has a signed notice from the patient, so the lab doesn't need to get another authorization. The correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the nuances of when a lab needs to obtain additional authorization beyond the doctor's notice. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about HIPAA requirements. I'll need to carefully review the details to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since Credential Guard is disabled on Server1, the best way to ensure it's most subject to the restrictions is to disable the Virtual Virtualization-Based Security group policy. That should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident that A is the right answer. The question specifically mentions ensuring the points fall on the boundary, so the "Point Must Be Covered By Boundary Of Polygon" rule seems like the logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
6 months ago
I'm a little confused about the difference between the System Event Logs and the Admin Activity log. Should I be looking at both, or is one more relevant for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
6 months ago
I could be wrong, but I think the correct answer might be closer to 15%. It sounds familiar from a previous practice question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
10 months ago
Hey, at least the options don't include 'All of the above' or 'None of the above'. Those always drive me crazy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
10 months ago
D? Really? Why would the lab need to get authorization from the doctor? That doesn't make any sense.
upvoted 0 times
Lettie
9 months ago
C) Obtain a specific authorization from the patient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
9 months ago
B) Do nothing more --- the activity is covered by the doctor's Notice of Privacy Practices
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
10 months ago
A) Request that the patient sign the lab's Notice of Privacy Practices
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonne
11 months ago
C seems like the safest option to me. It's always better to get a specific authorization from the patient just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Ma
9 months ago
B) Do nothing more --- the activity is covered by the doctor's Notice of Privacy Practices
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
9 months ago
C) Obtain a specific authorization from the patient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
10 months ago
B) Do nothing more --- the activity is covered by the doctor's Notice of Privacy Practices
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
10 months ago
C) Obtain a specific authorization from the patient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
10 months ago
A) Request that the patient sign the lab's Notice of Privacy Practices
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
10 months ago
A) Request that the patient sign the lab's Notice of Privacy Practices
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veronica
11 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. The lab is covered under the doctor's Notice of Privacy Practices, so they don't need to do anything else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
11 months ago
But what if the lab already has a signed Notice from the patient? Wouldn't that be enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
11 months ago
I agree with Adrianna. It's important to get the patient's authorization before disclosing their PHI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
11 months ago
I think the lab should obtain a specific authorization from the patient.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel