Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HIPAA HIO-201 Exam - Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for HIPAA's HIO-201 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 1
[All HIO-201 Questions]

A State insurance commissioner is requesting specific, individually identifiable information from an insurer as a part of a routine review of the insurer's practices. What must the insurer do to decertify the information?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Carline at Jun 21, 2024, 04:28 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HIO-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Reena
5 months ago
D seems risky. Asking for exceptions from HIPAA? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
6 months ago
Wait, can they really access that info without consent? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
6 months ago
B is better. Just limit the info to avoid issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
6 months ago
Totally agree, A makes the most sense here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
6 months ago
I think A is the right answer. You need to remove protected health info.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
7 months ago
I don't think requesting an exception from HIPAA is common practice, so D seems unlikely. E also seems off since I don't recall needing written authorization in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like oversight agencies can access info without authorization, which makes C a possibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
7 months ago
I think I saw a question like this before, and it was about limiting data to avoid protected health info. B sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
7 months ago
I remember something about removing identifiable information to protect privacy, so maybe A is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
7 months ago
I'm a little confused by all the options here. I'll need to re-read the question and think it through step-by-step. Gotta make sure I don't miss any important details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
7 months ago
Ah, this is right up my alley! I've dealt with similar situations before. I think option A is the way to go - remove the protected info but provide a way to re-identify if needed. Solid strategy to stay compliant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The key seems to be finding the right balance between the insurer's obligations to protect patient data and the regulator's need for information. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
7 months ago
This seems like a tricky question about protecting patient privacy while complying with regulatory oversight. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think through the legal and ethical implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
7 months ago
Easy peasy! Option B is clearly the best choice. Just provide the basic coverage and payment info, no need to hand over any protected data. Simple solution that keeps everyone happy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
7 months ago
Hmm, not sure I follow the instructions exactly. I'll need to double-check the worksheet and make sure I'm adjusting the right columns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
12 months ago
I'm with Kenda on this one. Gotta protect that patient data, even from the big shots. Just do it the right way, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
12 months ago
Someone's got a great sense of humor, throwing in that 'E' option. Definitely a trap for the unwary!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
12 months ago
D is a creative idea, but good luck getting an exception approved in time for this review. Might as well just do it by the book.
upvoted 0 times
Roselle
11 months ago
B) Limit the information to coverage, dates of treatment, and payment amounts to avoid collecting any protected data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
11 months ago
D) Request that the insurance commissioner ask for an exception from HIPAA from the Department of Health and Human Services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
11 months ago
E) B A written authorization is required from the patient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
11 months ago
A) The protected health information must be removed from the information. A substitute ''key'' may be supplied to allow re-identification, if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelle
1 year ago
C? Really? As if the government can just waltz in and take whatever data they want. Nice try, but I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Odelia
11 months ago
E) B A written authorization is required from the patient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
11 months ago
D) Request that the insurance commissioner ask for an exception from HIPAA from the Department of Health and Human Services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
11 months ago
A) The protected health information must be removed from the information. A substitute ''key'' may be supplied to allow re-identification, if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gary
1 year ago
B sounds like the safest option. No need to risk a HIPAA violation just to satisfy the commissioner's request.
upvoted 0 times
Latrice
11 months ago
Celestine: It's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to handling sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
11 months ago
User 2: Definitely, we need to make sure we follow HIPAA regulations at all times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
11 months ago
User 1: I agree, option B seems like the best choice to protect patient privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenda
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. Gotta be careful with that protected health info, even for oversight agencies.
upvoted 0 times
Melita
12 months ago
B) Limit the information to coverage, dates of treatment. and payment amounts to avoid collecting any protected data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
12 months ago
E) B A written authorization is required from the patient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
1 year ago
A) The protected health information must be removed from the information. A substitute ''key'' may be supplied to allow re-identification, if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Augustine
1 year ago
But what if the oversight agency has the right to access the information without authorization?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
1 year ago
I agree with that. It's important to protect individuals' privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
1 year ago
I think the insurer should remove the protected health information and provide a substitute key if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel