New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Data Engineer Exam - Topic 6 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Data Engineer exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 6
[All Professional Data Engineer Questions]

You are running a pipeline in Cloud Dataflow that receives messages from a Cloud Pub/Sub topic and writes the results to a BigQuery dataset in the EU. Currently, your pipeline is located in europe-west4 and has a maximum of 3 workers, instance type n1-standard-1. You notice that during peak periods, your pipeline is struggling to process records in a timely fashion, when all 3 workers are at maximum CPU utilization. Which two actions can you take to increase performance of your pipeline? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Pete
4 months ago
More workers and bigger instances should do the trick!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
4 months ago
I think creating a buffer in Bigtable is overkill for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
4 months ago
Wait, changing the zone to us-central1? Isn't that slower for EU data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
4 months ago
Definitely agree on using a larger instance type too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
5 months ago
Increasing the number of max workers is a solid move!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
5 months ago
Changing the zone to us-central1 doesn't seem right since we're already in europe-west4. I don't think that would help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
5 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where increasing workers helped. I feel like option A and B could work well together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the instance types. Would switching to a larger instance type really make a significant difference?
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
5 months ago
I remember we discussed increasing the number of max workers to handle more load during peak times. That seems like a solid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. The key here is that we need to give the User on the Reviewer_c record read-only access to the Defect_c record. I think Apex managed sharing or criteria-based sharing might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the Cisco Unity Connection restriction table. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
5 months ago
Okay, I've got an idea. If we use Proof instead of [PREVIEW], that should prevent the prefix from deploying in the live sends. I'm feeling confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question about HTML5 audio support. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is whether the new requirements are immediately enforced on existing passwords or not. I'll have to weigh the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel