Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Cloud Security Engineer Exam - Topic 1 Question 51 Discussion

You need to set up two network segments: one with an untrusted subnet and the other with a trusted subnet. You want to configure a virtual appliance such as a next-generation firewall (NGFW) to inspect all traffic between the two network segments. How should you design the network to inspect the traffic?
B) 1. Set up one VPC with two subnets: one trusted and the other untrusted. 2. Configure a custom route for all RFC1918 subnets pointed to the virtual appliance.
A) 1. Set up one VPC with two subnets: one trusted and the other untrusted. 2. Configure a custom route for all traffic (0.0.0.0/0) pointed to the virtual appliance.
C) 1. Set up two VPC networks: one trusted and the other untrusted, and peer them together. 2. Configure a custom route on each network pointed to the virtual appliance.
D) 1. Set up two VPC networks: one trusted and the other untrusted. 2. Configure a virtual appliance using multiple network interfaces, with each interface connected to one of the VPC networks.

Google Professional Cloud Security Engineer Exam - Topic 1 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Security Engineer exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 1
[All Professional Cloud Security Engineer Questions]

You need to set up two network segments: one with an untrusted subnet and the other with a trusted subnet. You want to configure a virtual appliance such as a next-generation firewall (NGFW) to inspect all traffic between the two network segments. How should you design the network to inspect the traffic?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Twana
7 months ago
Wait, can you really inspect all traffic like that? Sounds too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
7 months ago
D is interesting, but multiple interfaces? Seems like a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
7 months ago
C seems complicated, peering two VPCs? Not sure about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
8 months ago
I think B is better, only routing RFC1918 seems safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
8 months ago
Option A sounds solid, custom route for all traffic is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
8 months ago
I recall that peering two VPCs could complicate things, but it might be necessary for certain setups. I wonder if option C is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
8 months ago
I think option D sounds familiar from our practice questions. Using multiple interfaces on the virtual appliance seems like a solid way to manage traffic between the two segments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
8 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of routing traffic through the virtual appliance, but I'm not sure if it's better to use one VPC or two separate ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether to use custom routes for all traffic or just specific subnets. I feel like I’ve seen both approaches in different scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between the Salesforce APIs and which one would be best for exporting a large dataset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
8 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about the term used to describe a running service in the Services Management Console. I'm going to go with "Started" - that just seems like the most logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel