Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud Security Engineer Exam - Topic 1 Question 38 Discussion

You perform a security assessment on a customer architecture and discover that multiple VMs have public IP addresses. After providing a recommendation to remove the public IP addresses, you are told those VMs need to communicate to external sites as part of the customer's typical operations. What should you recommend to reduce the need for public IP addresses in your customer's VMs?
D) Cloud VPN
A) Google Cloud Armor
B) Cloud NAT
C) Cloud Router

Google Professional Cloud Security Engineer Exam - Topic 1 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Security Engineer exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 1
[All Professional Cloud Security Engineer Questions]

You perform a security assessment on a customer architecture and discover that multiple VMs have public IP addresses. After providing a recommendation to remove the public IP addresses, you are told those VMs need to communicate to external sites as part of the customer's typical operations. What should you recommend to reduce the need for public IP addresses in your customer's VMs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lai at May 07, 2022, 10:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Security Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Antione
9 months ago
Cloud NAT is great for outbound traffic without exposing VMs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
9 months ago
Wait, can Cloud Router really help with this? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
9 months ago
Definitely agree, public IPs are a security risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
9 months ago
I think Cloud VPN could work too, but not sure it's the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
9 months ago
Cloud NAT is the way to go for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
10 months ago
Cloud Router seems like it’s more for managing routes, so I doubt it’s the best option for reducing public IPs. I think Cloud NAT is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
10 months ago
I feel like Cloud VPN could be relevant if they need secure connections, but it doesn't really solve the public IP problem directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think Google Cloud Armor is more about security rather than addressing the public IP issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
10 months ago
I remember studying about Cloud NAT and how it allows VMs to access the internet without needing public IPs. That might be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
10 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. The folder policy denies INTERNAL_TCP_UDP and INTERNAL_HTTP_HTTPS, while the project policy denies EXTERNAL_TCP_PROXY and EXTERNAL_SSL_PROXY. So the answer must be option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know senior managers have an important role, but I'm not sure if it's more about leading the recovery teams or just overseeing the process. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks like it's asking about BIND server configuration. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the key details provided.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel