Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Cloud Database Engineer Exam - Topic 8 Question 67 Discussion

Posted by Catarina on Mar 06, 2026 at 06:41 AM

You have a large Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL instance. The database instance is not mission-critical, and you want to minimize operational costs. What should you do to lower the cost of backups in this environment?

Suggested Answer: D

By default, for each instance, Cloud SQL retains seven automated backups, in addition to on-demand backups. You can configure how many automated backups to retain (from 1 to 365). We charge a lower rate for backup storage than for other types of instances. https://cloud.google.com/sql/docs/mysql/backup-recovery/backups


Get Premium Professional Cloud Database Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
DE
Desmond 1 month ago
I’m leaning towards option C. Different regions might have lower rates.
RU
Rusty 1 month ago
Option D makes sense too. Keeping only two backups reduces costs.
WE
Werner 2 months ago
I prefer option B. HDD is cheaper than SSD for backups.
MY
Myrtie 2 months ago
I think option A is a good choice. Less frequent backups save money.
OR
Oretha 2 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C. Different regions might have lower rates.
VI
Vi 2 months ago
Option D makes sense too. Keeping only two backups cuts costs.
ER
Erin 2 months ago
I prefer option B. HDD is cheaper than SSD for backups.
HO
Howard 2 months ago
I think option A is a good choice. Less frequent backups save money.
GR
Gracia 3 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C. Different regions might have lower costs.
WA
Wade 3 months ago
Option D makes sense too. Keeping only two backups is efficient.
VO
Von 3 months ago
I prefer option B. HDD is cheaper than SSD for backups.
BR
Breana 3 months ago
I think option A is smart. Less frequent backups save costs.
YA
Yaeko 3 months ago
D) sounds smart, less clutter and cheaper!
MA
Malcolm 4 months ago
C) could lead to higher latency, not worth it.
GR
Gracia 5 months ago
Surprised that reducing retention to two backups is even an option!
VA
Vannessa 5 months ago
I disagree, B) might save more in the long run.
MA
Maryann 5 months ago
A) is a good option to save costs!
AI
Aide 6 months ago
D) sounds smart, less clutter and cheaper!
SH
Shayne 6 months ago
C) could lead to higher latency, not worth it.
GR
Gracie 6 months ago
Surprised that reducing retention to two backups is even an option!
DA
Daryl 6 months ago
I disagree, B) might save more in the long run.
AR
Aracelis 6 months ago
A) is a good option to save costs!
BE
Bettyann 6 months ago
I recall a practice question about backup regions, but I’m not convinced that option C would actually lower costs significantly.
HI
Hillary 7 months ago
I think reducing the number of backups retained in option D makes sense for cost savings, but I’m not clear on how that impacts recovery time.
TI
Timothy 7 months ago
I feel like changing the storage tier to HDD in option B might save money, but I wonder if it affects performance too much.
PA
Pansy 7 months ago
I remember we discussed backup frequency in class, and I think option A could help reduce costs, but I'm not sure if every other day is enough.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel