MENU
An organization has a small development team that has created a web application which runs in a single container. They need a simple serverless and scalable way to host their container Which Google service should the organization use?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium Cloud Digital Leader Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
CA
Cathrine
10 months ago
Wait, why not Compute Engine? Seems like a solid choice.
ME
Merissa
10 months ago
App Engine could work too, but Cloud Run is simpler.
CA
Catalina
11 months ago
I think Kubernetes Engine is overkill here.
SH
Shalon
11 months ago
Really? I thought they’d need something more robust than just one container.
CH
Chauncey
11 months ago
Definitely Cloud Run for that!
DI
Diane
11 months ago
I feel like Compute Engine is more for VMs, so it probably isn’t the answer here. I’d lean towards Cloud Run.
BE
Beatriz
11 months ago
App Engine sounds familiar, but I’m not sure if it’s the best fit for a single container application.
CA
Carylon
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about hosting containers, and I think Kubernetes Engine might be overkill for a small team.
RU
Rueben
12 months ago
I think Cloud Run is the right choice since it’s designed for running containers in a serverless way, but I’m not completely sure.
SI
Silvana
1 year ago
Compute Engine is probably not the right choice here. That's more for manually managing virtual machines, which doesn't seem to fit the requirements.
SH
Sharika
1 year ago
App Engine could be a good choice too. It's serverless and scalable, and it might be easier to set up than Kubernetes.
FR
Franklyn
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Kubernetes Engine might also work, but it might be overkill for a small development team. I'll have to think this through.
SH
Shaunna
1 year ago
I think Cloud Run is the best option here. It's a serverless platform that can automatically scale to handle the web application's traffic.
LO
Lou
1 year ago
As long as they don't try to host their container on a toaster, I think they'll be just fine with Cloud Run.
DA
Daisy
1 year ago
A) Cloud Run is serverless and scalable, so it should work well for them.
TY
Tyisha
1 year ago
C) App Engine could also be a good option for hosting their container.
SH
Shaun
1 year ago
A) Cloud Run sounds like the perfect fit for their needs.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think Kubernetes Engine could also be a good option for hosting the container.
CH
Charolette
1 year ago
I'm picturing the developers frantically googling 'How to host a container on Google Cloud' and stumbling upon Cloud Run. Seems like the obvious choice!
TY
Tyisha
1 year ago
I agree with Yolande. Cloud Run is serverless and scalable, which would be a good fit for their needs.
YO
Yolande
1 year ago
I think the organization should use Cloud Run for hosting their container.
JO
Jody
1 year ago
I bet the developers are hoping for a solution that doesn't require them to manage the underlying infrastructure. Cloud Run might be the winner here.
MO
Mollie
1 year ago
Yeah, Cloud Run seems like the perfect fit for their needs. It takes care of the infrastructure for them.
LE
Lenna
1 year ago
I think Cloud Run would be the best option for them. It's serverless and scalable.
BU
Bulah
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if Kubernetes Engine is overkill for a small development team. Cloud Run seems more appropriate.
YU
Yuonne
1 year ago
Cloud Run sounds like the way to go for a simple and scalable container hosting solution.
LO
Louis
1 year ago
Definitely, Cloud Run offers a simple and efficient solution for hosting containers.
CR
Crista
1 year ago
I agree, Cloud Run seems like the best option for hosting a container in a serverless and scalable way.
SH
Sharee
1 year ago
C) App Engine
IR
Ira
1 year ago
A) Cloud Run