Google Cloud Digital Leader Exam - Topic 3 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Cloud Digital Leader exam

Question #: 20
Topic #: 3

Your organization wants to optimize its use of Google Cloud's discounts on virtual machine-based workloads. You plan to use 200 CPUs constantly for the next 3 years, and you forecast that spikes of up to 300 CPUs will occur approximately 30% of the time. What should you choose?

A1-year committed use discount for 200 CPUs

B3-year committed use discount for 300 CPUs

C3-year committed use discount for 200 CPUs

DRegular pay-as-you-go pricing

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Arthur at May 06, 2022, 06:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Cloud Digital Leader Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Franchesca

4 months ago

A could work if you want flexibility, but not ideal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elke

4 months ago

Surprised that D is even an option here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Emogene

4 months ago

C seems risky with those CPU spikes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruthann

4 months ago

Totally agree, B covers the spikes too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamra

5 months ago

I think B is the best choice for long-term savings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karol

5 months ago

I’m leaning towards the pay-as-you-go option since it offers flexibility, but I know it might be more expensive in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

5 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the 3-year committed use discount for 200 CPUs could be a safe bet, but what if the spikes are more frequent than expected?

upvoted 0 times

...

Adell

5 months ago

I think the spikes in usage might make the 3-year committed use discount for 300 CPUs a better choice, but I need to double-check the cost differences.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harrison

5 months ago

I remember studying committed use discounts, but I'm not sure if we should go for the 3-year option or just stick with 200 CPUs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melodie

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got it. The question is asking about the general requirement to communicate a previously reported significant deficiency that has not been corrected. Based on my understanding, the correct answer is D - it should be communicated in writing during the current audit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janine

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused about how minimum illumination is affected. Does it really decrease when switching to a lower resolution? That seems counterintuitive to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimbery

5 months ago

This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd focus on identifying the long-term outcome that is most meaningful and impactful for Mike's overall quality of life.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

5 months ago

I vaguely recall the importance of having consumer subnets defined under EPG for proper route advertisement, but I'm unsure if it applies here.

upvoted 0 times

...