Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Cloud Digital Leader Exam - Topic 3 Question 20 Discussion

Your organization wants to optimize its use of Google Cloud's discounts on virtual machine-based workloads. You plan to use 200 CPUs constantly for the next 3 years, and you forecast that spikes of up to 300 CPUs will occur approximately 30% of the time. What should you choose?
D) Regular pay-as-you-go pricing
A) 1-year committed use discount for 200 CPUs
B) 3-year committed use discount for 300 CPUs
C) 3-year committed use discount for 200 CPUs

Google Cloud Digital Leader Exam - Topic 3 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Cloud Digital Leader exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 3
[All Cloud Digital Leader Questions]

Your organization wants to optimize its use of Google Cloud's discounts on virtual machine-based workloads. You plan to use 200 CPUs constantly for the next 3 years, and you forecast that spikes of up to 300 CPUs will occur approximately 30% of the time. What should you choose?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Arthur at May 06, 2022, 06:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Cloud Digital Leader Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Franchesca
10 months ago
A could work if you want flexibility, but not ideal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
10 months ago
Surprised that D is even an option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
11 months ago
C seems risky with those CPU spikes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
11 months ago
Totally agree, B covers the spikes too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
11 months ago
I think B is the best choice for long-term savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards the pay-as-you-go option since it offers flexibility, but I know it might be more expensive in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the 3-year committed use discount for 200 CPUs could be a safe bet, but what if the spikes are more frequent than expected?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
11 months ago
I think the spikes in usage might make the 3-year committed use discount for 300 CPUs a better choice, but I need to double-check the cost differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
11 months ago
I remember studying committed use discounts, but I'm not sure if we should go for the 3-year option or just stick with 200 CPUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The question is asking about the general requirement to communicate a previously reported significant deficiency that has not been corrected. Based on my understanding, the correct answer is D - it should be communicated in writing during the current audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about how minimum illumination is affected. Does it really decrease when switching to a lower resolution? That seems counterintuitive to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
11 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd focus on identifying the long-term outcome that is most meaningful and impactful for Mike's overall quality of life.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
11 months ago
I vaguely recall the importance of having consumer subnets defined under EPG for proper route advertisement, but I'm unsure if it applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel