MENU
Your project has just started, and you are observing that bugs are being caught in QA on features that were previously working You want to provide a self-governing mechanism for the team to identify regression bugs What should you do?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium Google Cloud - Apigee Certified API Engineer Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
27 comments · newest first
KR
Kristofer
10 months ago
Behavior Driven Development tools could help clarify requirements, but not sure if it's enough.
CA
Carmelina
10 months ago
Wait, are we really relying on developers to run tests? That seems risky.
TO
Tonette
10 months ago
Static code analysis tools can help, but they won't catch everything.
BE
Beula
10 months ago
I think asking developers to run unit tests is a good idea too!
LO
Louvenia
11 months ago
Automated integration testing sounds like the best way to catch those bugs early.
LU
Lura
11 months ago
Static code analysis tools sound useful, but I don't recall them being specifically for regression issues. I feel like they might miss some bugs that integration tests would catch.
EL
Elouise
11 months ago
I think Behavior Driven Development tools could help with understanding requirements better, but I'm not convinced they directly address regression bugs.
YO
Yolando
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like asking developers to run unit tests before check-ins might help too. It seems like a good practice, but is it enough?
GE
Gertude
12 months ago
I remember we talked about automated testing being crucial for catching regressions early. I think implementing automated integration testing could be the way to go.
KI
King
12 months ago
Asking developers to run unit tests before check-in is a good idea, but I'm not sure if that alone would be enough to address the regression bug problem. We'd need something more comprehensive.
AN
Annmarie
1 year ago
Behavior Driven Development tools could be a good way to define clear acceptance criteria and catch issues before they make it to QA. I'll have to think more about how that would work in this scenario.
AI
Aide
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option C - implementing automated integration testing on check-in. That could help catch regressions early in the development process.
DA
Darrin
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'm not sure if static code analysis tools would be the best approach here, since the issue is with regression bugs that are being caught in QA.
BI
Billy
1 year ago
A could be useful too, but I think C is the most comprehensive solution to address the problem.
CA
Casandra
1 year ago
I prefer implementing automated integration testing on check in.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the developer who wrote that code is sweating right now. Gotta love those regression bugs!
TA
Tasia
1 year ago
Hmm, D sounds like a good option. Developers running unit tests before check-in can be a great way to catch issues early on.
RU
Ruthann
1 year ago
B for me. Behavior Driven Development tools can really help the team stay on the same page and ensure we're testing the right things.
EU
Eugene
9 months ago
D is important too. Unit tests before check-in can save a lot of headaches later.
CA
Cassie
10 months ago
I like B as well. BDD keeps everyone aligned on requirements.
NO
Noah
11 months ago
A is solid too. Static code analysis can help prevent bugs before they happen.
LE
Leanna
11 months ago
I think C is the best option. Automated integration testing can catch issues early.
LA
Lavonna
1 year ago
I agree with Della, static code analysis tools can help catch bugs early.
DE
Della
1 year ago
I think we should use static code analysis tools.
DE
Dean
1 year ago
I think C is the way to go. Automated integration testing on check-in will help catch those pesky regression bugs before they even make it to QA.
FE
Felicitas
1 year ago
B) Use Behavior Driven Development tools.
AR
Arlen
1 year ago
A) Use static code analysis tools.