While maintaining the gist history, which of the following is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist?
Forking a gist is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist while maintaining the history of the original gist. When you fork a gist, you create a new gist in your own account that retains a link to the original, allowing you to track changes and contribute back if desired.
Forking a Gist:
Option A is correct because forking is a straightforward way to create your own copy of another user's gist while preserving the history and making it easy to track updates.
Incorrect Options:
Option B is incorrect because creating a new gist and copying the content would not preserve the history or link back to the original gist.
Option C is incorrect because cloning is typically associated with repositories, not gists, and is more complex than forking for this purpose.
Option D is incorrect because requesting to be added to the existing gist is not a standard GitHub feature.
Regenia
7 months agoCherry
7 months agoAgustin
6 months agoVal
6 months agoDaron
6 months agoJacki
7 months agoAudrie
7 months agoReita
5 months agoElly
5 months agoTawanna
5 months agoMarylin
6 months agoHillary
7 months agoTamar
6 months agoJeannine
6 months agoVeronika
7 months agoPearly
7 months agoTommy
6 months agoSang
7 months agoTheron
7 months agoCherilyn
7 months agoVanesa
7 months agoTanja
7 months agoAlana
7 months agoFranklyn
7 months ago