While maintaining the gist history, which of the following is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist?
Forking a gist is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist while maintaining the history of the original gist. When you fork a gist, you create a new gist in your own account that retains a link to the original, allowing you to track changes and contribute back if desired.
Forking a Gist:
Option A is correct because forking is a straightforward way to create your own copy of another user's gist while preserving the history and making it easy to track updates.
Incorrect Options:
Option B is incorrect because creating a new gist and copying the content would not preserve the history or link back to the original gist.
Option C is incorrect because cloning is typically associated with repositories, not gists, and is more complex than forking for this purpose.
Option D is incorrect because requesting to be added to the existing gist is not a standard GitHub feature.
Regenia
11 months agoCherry
11 months agoAgustin
10 months agoVal
10 months agoDaron
10 months agoJacki
11 months agoAudrie
11 months agoReita
10 months agoElly
10 months agoTawanna
10 months agoMarylin
11 months agoHillary
11 months agoTamar
10 months agoJeannine
11 months agoVeronika
11 months agoPearly
11 months agoTommy
11 months agoSang
11 months agoTheron
11 months agoCherilyn
11 months agoVanesa
12 months agoTanja
12 months agoAlana
11 months agoFranklyn
11 months ago