While maintaining the gist history, which of the following is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist?
Forking a gist is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist while maintaining the history of the original gist. When you fork a gist, you create a new gist in your own account that retains a link to the original, allowing you to track changes and contribute back if desired.
Forking a Gist:
Option A is correct because forking is a straightforward way to create your own copy of another user's gist while preserving the history and making it easy to track updates.
Incorrect Options:
Option B is incorrect because creating a new gist and copying the content would not preserve the history or link back to the original gist.
Option C is incorrect because cloning is typically associated with repositories, not gists, and is more complex than forking for this purpose.
Option D is incorrect because requesting to be added to the existing gist is not a standard GitHub feature.
Regenia
8 months agoCherry
8 months agoAgustin
7 months agoVal
7 months agoDaron
7 months agoJacki
8 months agoAudrie
8 months agoReita
7 months agoElly
7 months agoTawanna
7 months agoMarylin
8 months agoHillary
8 months agoTamar
7 months agoJeannine
8 months agoVeronika
8 months agoPearly
9 months agoTommy
8 months agoSang
8 months agoTheron
8 months agoCherilyn
8 months agoVanesa
9 months agoTanja
9 months agoAlana
8 months agoFranklyn
8 months ago