Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GitHub Exam GitHub-Advanced-Security Topic 7 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for GitHub's GitHub-Advanced-Security exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 7
[All GitHub-Advanced-Security Questions]

-- [Use Code Scanning with CodeQL]

How would you build your code within the CodeQL analysis workflow? (Each answer presents a complete solution. Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, F

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

When setting up CodeQL analysis for compiled languages, there are two primary methods to build your code:

GitHub Docs

Autobuild: CodeQL attempts to automatically build your codebase using the most likely build method. This is suitable for standard build processes.

GitHub Docs

Custom Build Steps: For complex or non-standard build processes, you can implement custom build steps by specifying explicit build commands in your workflow. This provides greater control over the build process.

GitHub Docs

The init action initializes the CodeQL analysis but does not build the code. The jobs.analyze.runs-on specifies the operating system for the runner but is not directly related to building the code. Uploading compiled binaries is not a method supported by CodeQL for analysis.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ellen
2 months ago
This is easy, B and F. CodeQL's init action and autobuild? It's like they've been reading my mind. Now, if only they could also make me a cup of coffee, that would be the cherry on top.
upvoted 0 times
Jennie
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it's like they thought of everything we need for code scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, using CodeQL's init action and autobuild makes the workflow so smooth.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonor
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd say B and F. Feels like a no-brainer to me. Though I do wonder if the autobuild action comes with a complimentary juggling act. Just a thought.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
3 months ago
B and E, all the way. CodeQL's init action and the jobs.analyze.runs-on are the real deal. Keeps my code in check like a boss!
upvoted 0 times
Julieta
2 months ago
Implementing custom build steps can give more control over the analysis process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
2 months ago
I prefer to upload compiled binaries for a more comprehensive analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
2 months ago
Definitely, jobs.analyze.runs-on is crucial for specifying the environment for code analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
2 months ago
I agree, using CodeQL's init action is essential for setting up the analysis workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jame
3 months ago
D and F for me. Gotta love those custom build steps and that autobuild magic. It's like having a personal assistant for my code.
upvoted 0 times
Rolland
2 months ago
I agree with you on D and F. Implementing custom build steps and using autobuild action really streamline the workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
2 months ago
I think E and F are the way to go. Setting the runs-on property and using CodeQL's autobuild action are essential for efficient code analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
2 months ago
I prefer A and B. Uploading compiled binaries and using CodeQL's init action make the process smoother.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annice
3 months ago
I prefer to upload compiled binaries for faster analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
3 months ago
I would also consider implementing custom build steps for more control over the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
3 months ago
I agree with Wynell, using CodeQL's init action seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
4 months ago
B and F, of course! Who doesn't love a good init action and an autobuild? Let's get this party started!
upvoted 0 times
Erick
2 months ago
Emogene: Perfect combo for a smooth workflow!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
3 months ago
User 2: Same here! And then I use the autobuild action to get things going.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
3 months ago
User 1: I always start with CodeQL's init action.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wynell
4 months ago
I think I would use CodeQL's init action to build my code.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel