Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GIAC GCIH Exam - Topic 11 Question 24 Discussion

Posted by Yvonne on Aug 03, 2024 at 06:05 PM

Adam works as a Security Analyst for Umbrella Inc. CEO of the company ordered him to implement two-factor authentication for the employees to access their networks. He has told him that he would like to use some type of hardware device in tandem with a security or identifying pin number. Adam decides to implement smart cards but they are not cost effective.

Which of the following types of hardware devices will Adam use to implement two-factor

authentication?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium GCIH Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
HY
Hyman 10 months ago
Wait, are smart cards really that expensive?
GO
Goldie 11 months ago
One Time Passwords are convenient but can be risky.
AS
Ashley 11 months ago
Proximity cards seem a bit outdated, don't they?
KI
Kizzy 11 months ago
I think security tokens are the way to go.
MI
Mira 11 months ago
Biometric devices are super secure!
LA
Lai 11 months ago
One Time Passwords seem like a common method, but I don't think they fit the hardware device requirement in this case.
WA
Wava 12 months ago
I feel like proximity cards could work too, but I can't recall if they are considered a strong enough second factor.
AD
Adelle 12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where security tokens were mentioned as a reliable option for two-factor authentication. I think that might be the answer here.
SY
Sylvie 12 months ago
I remember studying about two-factor authentication, and I think biometric devices could be a good option, but I'm not sure if they are the best choice for this scenario.
NO
Nohemi 12 months ago
This is a great question! I think the answer is B, security token. It's a hardware device that can be used with a PIN number, and it's a cost-effective solution compared to smart cards. I'm confident in this answer.
JA
Jacquelyne 12 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. It seems like the CEO wants a hardware device, but it's not clear if they need to be used with a PIN or if they can be used on their own. I'll need to re-read the question carefully to make sure I understand the requirements.
BR
Bronwyn 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. Based on the information provided, the best option is a security token. It's a hardware device that can be used in tandem with a PIN number, and it's typically more cost-effective than smart cards.
EL
Elenore 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions that the CEO wants a hardware device, but it doesn't specify the exact requirements. I'll need to carefully consider the options to determine the most appropriate solution.
KE
Kendra 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about two-factor authentication. I think the key is to identify the hardware device that would be cost-effective for the company, since smart cards are not an option.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the responsibilities of a payroll department manager. I'll carefully read through the options and choose the one that best describes their key duties.
MI
Mitzie 1 year ago
I vote for a good old-fashioned tin can and string setup. It's retro, it's secure, and it'll really give the employees a sense of nostalgia when they have to use it to access the network. Plus, it's probably cheaper than any of these fancy 'hardware devices'.
CL
Clarinda 1 year ago
B) Security token all the way! It's a tried and true method that's been keeping IT departments secure for years. And let's be honest, who doesn't love a good old-fashioned security token? It's like a digital version of a pocket watch.
TA
Tayna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Clarinda
C) Proximity cards could be convenient for employees. They just need to swipe to access.
OW
Owen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Clarinda
D) One Time Password is good, but Security token is a classic choice for two-factor authentication.
HA
Haydee 1 year ago
↳ replying to Clarinda
C) Proximity cards could work, but Security token is definitely the way to go.
WI
William 1 year ago
↳ replying to Clarinda
B) Security token is definitely a reliable choice. It's easy to use and effective.
CO
Coral 1 year ago
↳ replying to Clarinda
A) Biometric device sounds cool too, but I think Security token is more reliable.
DO
Dorcas 1 year ago
↳ replying to Clarinda
A) Biometric device sounds like a good option too. It adds an extra layer of security.
ES
Esteban 1 year ago
I'd say C) Proximity cards. They're affordable, easy to use, and can integrate seamlessly with the existing network. Plus, they're just really cool, like something out of a spy movie.
JO
Johnson 1 year ago
But biometric devices can be expensive. Maybe Adam should look into using security tokens instead.
EZ
Ezekiel 1 year ago
I agree with Audria, biometric devices are more secure and reliable than other options.
AU
Audria 1 year ago
I think Adam should consider using a biometric device for two-factor authentication.
CA
Casie 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Biometric devices can be a bit pricey, and proximity cards might not provide the level of security the CEO wants. I think D) One Time Password is a solid choice.
RE
Reed 1 year ago
↳ replying to Casie
Security tokens are also a good option, they are portable and easy to use.
CA
Cathrine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Casie
I agree, One Time Passwords are cost effective and provide an extra layer of security.
KR
Kristeen 2 years ago
I'd go with B) Security token. It's a classic two-factor solution that's both secure and cost-effective. Plus, it's easy to implement and use.
LA
Laine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kristeen
Great choice! It's important to prioritize security while considering cost.
HA
Hana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kristeen
I've used Security tokens before, they're easy to use and implement.
MI
Ming 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kristeen
Yeah, I agree. It's a classic two-factor solution that works well.
YU
Yuriko 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kristeen
I think B) Security token is a good choice. It's secure and cost-effective.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel