Acme Corporation is doing a core evaluation of its centralized logging capabilities. Which of the following scenarios indicates a failure in more than one CIS Control?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium GCCC Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
JE
Jess
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure A is a failure in multiple controls? Seems like just one to me.
SC
Scarlet
11 months ago
B seems minor, but it could cause confusion later on.
GL
Glenn
11 months ago
C is a classic mistake, time sync is crucial for logs.
AS
Asha
11 months ago
I think D is worse, undocumented servers can lead to major issues.
JO
Jose
11 months ago
A is definitely a problem, missing logs is a big deal.
MI
Micaela
12 months ago
Option B seems less critical to me, but I guess different timezones could still cause issues with log analysis. Not sure if it counts as multiple failures though.
SA
Samira
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where missing logs pointed to control failures. So, I'm leaning towards option A being a strong candidate.
FI
Filiberto
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about time synchronization being important for logs. Maybe option C is relevant here?
LO
Lorriane
1 year ago
I think option D might indicate a failure in multiple CIS Controls, especially if those servers are undocumented.
MA
Matilda
1 year ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. I'm pretty sure it's the IP address change that requires the neighbor relationship to be re-established. The other options don't seem as critical for the neighbor connection.
MA
Maddie
1 year ago
Okay, let me see here. I remember that the WEM Agent can be installed on the Citrix Workspace Environment Management Infrastructure Services server, so I'll go with option B.
FI
Filiberto
1 year ago
I remember studying the steps for image upgrades, and I think using a different kickstart image might be the right move here.
EM
Emily
1 year ago
Okay, RAID-10 makes sense to me. It's got the redundancy of RAID-1 with the striping of RAID-0. I'm confident that's the right answer.