New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GFOA CPFO Exam - Topic 12 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for GFOA's CPFO exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 12
[All CPFO Questions]

Risks are not assumed should, if possible, be transferred either by a ______________.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mignon
2 months ago
Totally agree, both are good strategies!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
2 months ago
Wait, can you really transfer all risks like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
3 months ago
I thought waivers were more about insurance claims, not risk transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
3 months ago
I think both options are valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
3 months ago
Definitely a hold-harmless contract clause!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
3 months ago
I’m torn between A and B. I know they both deal with risk transfer, but I can’t recall which one is more commonly used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
4 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question like this before, and I think it was about how both options can help in risk management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about hold-harmless clauses being important in liability agreements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
4 months ago
I think the answer might be C, both of these, since both clauses are used to transfer risk in contracts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
4 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely confident in my understanding of the differences between these risk transfer methods. I'll need to think it through step-by-step to make sure I get the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
4 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking about how to transfer risks, and the options mention a hold-harmless clause and a waiver of subrogation. I'll review those concepts and select the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we covered risk transfer strategies in class, but I'm having trouble remembering the specific terminology. Let me think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward risk management question. I'll focus on identifying the key terms and concepts to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
8 months ago
C) Both of these, no doubt about it. I've seen these risk transfer methods used in countless contracts. This is a textbook question, really.
upvoted 0 times
Natalie
7 months ago
B) Waiver of subrogation
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
8 months ago
A) Hold-harmless contract clause
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dannie
8 months ago
Haha, this question is a real mind-bender! I'm going with C) Both of these, but I'm tempted to just go with the 'none of the above' option just to mess with the graders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
8 months ago
Definitely C) Both of these. That's the most comprehensive answer in my opinion. I can't imagine any other options being valid here.
upvoted 0 times
Britt
7 months ago
C) Both of these seem like the most secure choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
8 months ago
It's always better to have multiple ways to transfer risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
8 months ago
I think having both options is the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
8 months ago
I agree, C) Both of these cover all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Crista
9 months ago
You might be right, it does make sense to transfer risks through both clauses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
9 months ago
But wouldn't both A and B be correct? So the answer is C) Both of these.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Waiver of subrogation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
10 months ago
I think the answer is A) Hold-harmless contract clause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I was considering D) None of these, but now I'm second-guessing myself. Decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
10 months ago
I think the correct answer is C) Both of these. Transferring risk through a hold-harmless contract clause and a waiver of subrogation are both effective ways to manage risks.
upvoted 0 times
Crista
8 months ago
By having both, you can effectively manage and transfer risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
8 months ago
It's crucial to have both a hold-harmless contract clause and a waiver of subrogation in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
8 months ago
I agree, both options are important for transferring risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
9 months ago
Yes, having both options gives added protection and helps manage risks effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
9 months ago
It's crucial to have both in place to protect against potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
10 months ago
I agree, transferring risk through both a hold-harmless contract clause and a waiver of subrogation is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel