Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GFOA Exam CPFO Topic 12 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for GFOA's CPFO exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 12
[All CPFO Questions]

Risks are not assumed should, if possible, be transferred either by a ______________.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Twana at May 02, 2025, 09:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPFO Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Felton
28 days ago
C) Both of these, no doubt about it. I've seen these risk transfer methods used in countless contracts. This is a textbook question, really.
upvoted 0 times
Natalie
3 days ago
B) Waiver of subrogation
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
13 days ago
A) Hold-harmless contract clause
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dannie
29 days ago
Haha, this question is a real mind-bender! I'm going with C) Both of these, but I'm tempted to just go with the 'none of the above' option just to mess with the graders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
30 days ago
Definitely C) Both of these. That's the most comprehensive answer in my opinion. I can't imagine any other options being valid here.
upvoted 0 times
Britt
5 days ago
C) Both of these seem like the most secure choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
11 days ago
It's always better to have multiple ways to transfer risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
25 days ago
I think having both options is the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
26 days ago
I agree, C) Both of these cover all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Crista
2 months ago
You might be right, it does make sense to transfer risks through both clauses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
2 months ago
But wouldn't both A and B be correct? So the answer is C) Both of these.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Waiver of subrogation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Hold-harmless contract clause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I was considering D) None of these, but now I'm second-guessing myself. Decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is C) Both of these. Transferring risk through a hold-harmless contract clause and a waiver of subrogation are both effective ways to manage risks.
upvoted 0 times
Crista
1 months ago
By having both, you can effectively manage and transfer risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
1 months ago
It's crucial to have both a hold-harmless contract clause and a waiver of subrogation in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
1 months ago
I agree, both options are important for transferring risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
2 months ago
Yes, having both options gives added protection and helps manage risks effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
2 months ago
It's crucial to have both in place to protect against potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
2 months ago
I agree, transferring risk through both a hold-harmless contract clause and a waiver of subrogation is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel