MENU
When comparing the network bandwidth and performance (jitter, packet loss, latency) between G.711 and 6.729 codes, which one of the statements is true?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium GE0-807 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
MA
Mariko
10 months ago
G.711 has better quality, no doubt about it.
JE
Jesusita
10 months ago
Totally agree, G.729 is more efficient!
OL
Olga
10 months ago
G.729 uses 8kbit/s, G.711 uses 64kbit/s.
NI
Nicholle
11 months ago
I thought they had similar performance requirements?
LE
Lelia
11 months ago
Wait, does G.729 really need better performance?
HO
Howard
11 months ago
I believe G.711 has a higher MOS score, but I'm confused about how that relates to bandwidth and performance requirements.
DO
Dortha
11 months ago
I feel like G.729 is the one that compresses more, but I can't recall if it also needs better network performance.
SH
Shoshana
12 months ago
I think I practiced a question similar to this, and it mentioned that G.711 needs better network conditions due to its higher bandwidth.
PR
Providencia
12 months ago
I remember that G.729 is more efficient in terms of bandwidth, but I'm not sure about the exact performance differences.
CA
Cathrine
1 year ago
Ah yes, I remember this from class. G.729 requires less bandwidth than G.711, but G.711 has better network performance overall. I'm feeling good about answering this one correctly.
RU
Ruthann
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know G.711 and G.729 have different bandwidth and performance characteristics, but I can't quite remember the specifics. I'll have to review my notes to be sure.
LO
Louvenia
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this. G.729 has a lower bandwidth requirement than G.711, but G.711 has better network performance in terms of jitter, packet loss, and latency.
DE
Detra
1 year ago
Okay, I think I know the difference between these two codecs. G.729 requires less bandwidth but may have slightly worse network performance compared to G.711. I'll double-check that before answering.
LE
Leontine
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully compare the bandwidth and performance requirements for G.711 and G.729 to figure out which statement is true.
SH
Sherita
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know Cloud Pak is an IBM product, but I'm not sure about the specific deployment options. I'll have to make an educated guess on this one.
KA
Karol
2 years ago
Wow, G.729 is like the compact car of the audio codec world - smaller, but still gets you where you need to go. I'll remember that one.
NI
Nieves
2 years ago
It's amazing how technology can make things smaller and more efficient!
TR
Truman
2 years ago
G) 711, with a sample size of 64kbit/s, achieves a maximum MOS of 4.1, whereas G.729, with a much smaller sample size of 8kbit/s, can achieve a MOS of 3.9. G.729 is 'compressed eight times smaller than G.711 while sounding almost as good.'
TA
Tamesha
2 years ago
That's right, G.729 is more efficient in terms of bandwidth usage.
BA
Barrett
2 years ago
B) G.729 requires less bandwidth than G.711, but G.711 requires better network performance
RO
Rosalind
2 years ago
Option G is quite informative. G.711 may have a higher MOS, but G.729 packs a lot of quality in a smaller footprint. I'll keep that in mind.
LA
Laticia
2 years ago
That's interesting. So G.729 is more efficient in terms of bandwidth, but it needs better network performance. Good to know!
DE
Derrick
2 years ago
G.729 requires less bandwidth than G.711, but G.729 requires better network performance
RE
Rebbecca
2 years ago
Option G is quite informative. G.711 may have a higher MOS, but G.729 packs a lot of quality in a smaller footprint. I'll keep that in mind.
FL
Fletcher
2 years ago
Interesting point, but I still think B) is the correct answer based on the comparison of network performance between G.711 and G.729.
LO
Louisa
2 years ago
I agree with Mari. G.729 is more bandwidth-efficient but needs a better network to perform well.
MA
Mari
2 years ago
Option D is the correct answer. G.729 requires less bandwidth but has stricter network performance requirements than G.711.
WI
Willetta
2 years ago
Yes, that's correct. G.729 requires less bandwidth but better network performance.
ME
Melissia
2 years ago
So, G.729 requires better network performance compared to G.711, right?
GE
Genevive
2 years ago
That makes sense. G.729 is compressed eight times smaller than G.711 while still sounding almost as good.
MA
Margery
2 years ago
I think option D is the correct answer. G.729 requires less bandwidth but has stricter network performance requirements than G.711.
LA
Lashunda
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) G.729 requires less bandwidth than G.711, but G.729 requires better network performance.
FL
Fletcher
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) G.729 requires less bandwidth than G.711, but G.711 requires better network performance.