I'm cracking up at the idea of 'dynamic collateral provisions' increasing counterparty risk. That's like saying 'fire extinguishers increase the risk of fire'.
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm going to have to go with C. The exposure at default can be negatively correlated to probability of default. Sounds counterintuitive, but it makes sense if you think about it.
Alverta
1 months agoPaola
20 days agoCelestina
26 days agoHannah
1 months agoRaylene
1 months agoTonja
2 months agoMarilynn
2 months agoSalena
2 months agoShaunna
1 months agoKathrine
1 months agoJose
2 months agoLorenza
2 months agoKarl
2 months agoTeddy
28 days agoNohemi
1 months agoDino
1 months agoVesta
1 months agoJoaquin
2 months agoLuz
2 months agoLucille
1 months agoHobert
1 months agoAdelle
2 months ago