Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM LCP-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 42 Discussion

Which command line option would you use to restrict the GNU find command to searching a particular number of subdirectories?
D) -s
A) --max-dirs
B) -dirmax
C) -maxdepth
E) -n

GAQM LCP-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's LCP-001 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 3
[All LCP-001 Questions]

Which command line option would you use to restrict the GNU find command to searching a particular number of subdirectories?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Heike at Jan 07, 2023, 04:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium LCP-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carli
10 months ago
I thought there was a limit on subdirectories, but this is new to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
10 months ago
Wait, is there really a -dirmax option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
10 months ago
I always get confused with these options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
10 months ago
Yeah, -maxdepth is definitely the one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
11 months ago
I think it's -maxdepth!
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
11 months ago
I’m not sure about the exact command, but I feel like --max-dirs isn't a standard option for find.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
11 months ago
I’m pretty confident that -maxdepth is the right choice here; I used it in a similar question last week.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
11 months ago
I remember practicing with find commands, and I feel like -dirmax sounds familiar, but it could be a different context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
11 months ago
I think the option for limiting subdirectories might be -maxdepth, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
11 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The statement is wrong because a single component can't be exposed as all those different service types simultaneously. I'll select the appropriate options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
11 months ago
This one seems straightforward - the MITRE ATT&CK framework is all about understanding the tactics and techniques used by attackers, so option A is the clear choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know Cosmos DB has a lot of features for high availability and redundancy, but I'm not sure which one specifically provides redundancy within a single Azure region. I'll have to review my notes on Cosmos DB architecture before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
1 year ago
I bet the exam writer is having a field day watching us debate this. They're probably sitting back, sipping their coffee, and thinking, 'Yep, that's exactly the reaction I was going for.'
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of choosing the right find command option. I'm feeling a bit 'maxdepthly' about this one.
upvoted 0 times
Glenn
1 year ago
I agree, it's C) -maxdepth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
1 year ago
C) -maxdepth
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 year ago
No, I believe it's A) --max-dirs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 year ago
A) --max-dirs
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 year ago
I think it's C) -maxdepth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
1 year ago
C) -maxdepth
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Abel
1 year ago
Wait, is -s for 'search' or 'shallow'? I can never remember which one it is. Maybe I should just stick with -maxdepth to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Hubert
1 year ago
I always use -maxdepth to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
1 year ago
Yeah, -s is for 'shallow'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 year ago
I think -s is for 'shallow'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lazaro
1 year ago
C'mon, -maxdepth is the classic choice here. I use that all the time when I don't want to dig too deep into the file system.
upvoted 0 times
Angella
1 year ago
It's a handy option to have when you want to narrow down the search scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
1 year ago
I always use -maxdepth when I need to control how deep find searches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
Yeah, it's a simple and effective option to limit the search.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
1 year ago
I agree, -maxdepth is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
1 year ago
Yeah, -maxdepth is the standard choice for limiting subdirectory searches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
1 year ago
-maxdepth is definitely the most common option for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
1 year ago
I usually stick with -maxdepth as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
1 year ago
I agree, -maxdepth is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adela
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd go with -maxdepth. Seems like the most straightforward option to limit the search depth.
upvoted 0 times
Joye
1 year ago
I think -maxdepth is the best choice too. It's simple and does the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
1 year ago
I agree, -maxdepth is the way to go. It's clear and easy to remember.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odelia
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be A) --max-dirs because it mentions limiting the number of directories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
1 year ago
I agree with Devon, -maxdepth makes sense to limit the search depth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) -maxdepth.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel