Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM LCP-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 42 Discussion

Posted by Heike on Jan 07, 2023 at 04:53 PM

Which command line option would you use to restrict the GNU find command to searching a particular number of subdirectories?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium LCP-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
CA
Carli 12 months ago
I thought there was a limit on subdirectories, but this is new to me!
ED
Eden 12 months ago
Wait, is there really a -dirmax option?
BE
Bettina 12 months ago
I always get confused with these options.
DI
Dick 1 year ago
Yeah, -maxdepth is definitely the one.
NA
Nan 1 year ago
I think it's -maxdepth!
YO
Youlanda 1 year ago
I’m not sure about the exact command, but I feel like --max-dirs isn't a standard option for find.
WI
Willie 1 year ago
I’m pretty confident that -maxdepth is the right choice here; I used it in a similar question last week.
NA
Natalie 1 year ago
I remember practicing with find commands, and I feel like -dirmax sounds familiar, but it could be a different context.
EL
Ellsworth 1 year ago
I think the option for limiting subdirectories might be -maxdepth, but I'm not entirely sure.
GE
Gerald 1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The statement is wrong because a single component can't be exposed as all those different service types simultaneously. I'll select the appropriate options.
SA
Salley 1 year ago
This one seems straightforward - the MITRE ATT&CK framework is all about understanding the tactics and techniques used by attackers, so option A is the clear choice here.
GA
Galen 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know Cosmos DB has a lot of features for high availability and redundancy, but I'm not sure which one specifically provides redundancy within a single Azure region. I'll have to review my notes on Cosmos DB architecture before answering.
ME
Melina 1 year ago
I bet the exam writer is having a field day watching us debate this. They're probably sitting back, sipping their coffee, and thinking, 'Yep, that's exactly the reaction I was going for.'
MA
Matthew 1 year ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of choosing the right find command option. I'm feeling a bit 'maxdepthly' about this one.
GL
Glenn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Matthew
I agree, it's C) -maxdepth.
MA
Maryrose 1 year ago
↳ replying to Matthew
C) -maxdepth
CL
Clay 1 year ago
↳ replying to Matthew
No, I believe it's A) --max-dirs.
PA
Paris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Matthew
A) --max-dirs
PA
Paris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Matthew
I think it's C) -maxdepth.
MI
Michael 1 year ago
↳ replying to Matthew
C) -maxdepth
AB
Abel 1 year ago
Wait, is -s for 'search' or 'shallow'? I can never remember which one it is. Maybe I should just stick with -maxdepth to be safe.
HU
Hubert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Abel
I always use -maxdepth to be safe.
FL
Flo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Abel
Yeah, -s is for 'shallow'.
AM
Amber 1 year ago
↳ replying to Abel
I think -s is for 'shallow'.
LA
Lazaro 2 years ago
C'mon, -maxdepth is the classic choice here. I use that all the time when I don't want to dig too deep into the file system.
AN
Angella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lazaro
It's a handy option to have when you want to narrow down the search scope.
LE
Leanna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lazaro
I always use -maxdepth when I need to control how deep find searches.
LI
Lindsey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lazaro
Yeah, it's a simple and effective option to limit the search.
DE
Desire 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lazaro
I agree, -maxdepth is definitely the way to go.
LA
Lashon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lazaro
Yeah, -maxdepth is the standard choice for limiting subdirectory searches.
MA
Marti 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lazaro
-maxdepth is definitely the most common option for that.
YV
Yvonne 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lazaro
I usually stick with -maxdepth as well.
CO
Coleen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lazaro
I agree, -maxdepth is the way to go.
AD
Adela 2 years ago
Hmm, I'd go with -maxdepth. Seems like the most straightforward option to limit the search depth.
JO
Joye 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adela
I think -maxdepth is the best choice too. It's simple and does the job.
SA
Samuel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adela
I agree, -maxdepth is the way to go. It's clear and easy to remember.
OD
Odelia 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be A) --max-dirs because it mentions limiting the number of directories.
BE
Bette 2 years ago
I agree with Devon, -maxdepth makes sense to limit the search depth.
DE
Devon 2 years ago
I think the answer is C) -maxdepth.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel