Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM LCP-001 Exam - Topic 2 Question 61 Discussion

Which chown command will change the ownership to dave and the group to staff on a file named data.txt?
D) chown dave:staff data.txt
A) chown dave/staff data.txt
B) chown -u dave -g staff data.txt
C) chown -user dave -group staff data.txt

GAQM LCP-001 Exam - Topic 2 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's LCP-001 exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 2
[All LCP-001 Questions]

Which chown command will change the ownership to dave and the group to staff on a file named data.txt?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Louisa at Mar 17, 2024, 12:26 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium LCP-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carmen
9 months ago
I’m surprised there’s no option for just "chown dave staff data.txt"!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
9 months ago
A is totally wrong, you can't use a slash like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
10 months ago
Wait, is C even a valid command?
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
10 months ago
I thought it was B at first, but D is right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
10 months ago
It's definitely D, that's the correct syntax!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
10 months ago
I’m confused about the options. I thought "chown -user" was correct, but now I’m not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
10 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think using "chown dave:staff" is the right way to specify both user and group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
11 months ago
I remember practicing with similar questions, and I feel like the syntax is important. Was it -u and -g for user and group?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
11 months ago
I think the command should use a colon to separate the user and group, so maybe it's D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
11 months ago
I think B is the right answer. The -u and -g options allow you to specify the user and group separately, which seems like it would work for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
11 months ago
Option D looks good to me. The chown command with the user and group separated by a colon is the standard way to change both the owner and group on a file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know the chown command is used to change ownership, but I'm not sure about the exact syntax. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is D. The chown command takes the user and group separated by a colon, so that's the correct syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
11 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward NetSuite configuration question. I think the key is to focus on the specific settings needed to track defective items returned to vendors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
11 months ago
The Copy Artifact plugin sounds like the right answer to me. I've used that before to pull in files from a previous build, so that makes the most sense for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident that it's not about determining the flow of a process. I feel like that's more for flowcharts instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
11 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on the key differences between the two protocols and how that might impact the communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
2 years ago
The colon is usually used to separate user and group, so I feel confident D) chown dave:staff data.txt is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's either A) chown dave/staff data.txt or D) chown dave:staff data.txt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
2 years ago
I agree with Nieves, D) chown dave:staff data.txt makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) chown dave:staff data.txt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
2 years ago
I see your point, Chan, but I think specifying both user and group separately might not work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) chown -u dave -g staff data.txt could also be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
2 years ago
I agree with Farrah, using : to specify both user and group makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) chown dave:staff data.txt.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel