Which chown command will change the ownership to dave and the group to staff on a file named data.txt?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium LCP-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
25 comments · newest first
CA
Carmen
11 months ago
I’m surprised there’s no option for just "chown dave staff data.txt"!
AL
Alise
11 months ago
A is totally wrong, you can't use a slash like that.
PH
Phil
11 months ago
Wait, is C even a valid command?
MA
Markus
12 months ago
I thought it was B at first, but D is right.
CA
Casey
12 months ago
It's definitely D, that's the correct syntax!
GR
Gregg
12 months ago
I’m confused about the options. I thought "chown -user" was correct, but now I’m not so sure.
MI
Minna
1 year ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think using "chown dave:staff" is the right way to specify both user and group.
LA
Laila
1 year ago
I remember practicing with similar questions, and I feel like the syntax is important. Was it -u and -g for user and group?
HU
Hubert
1 year ago
I think the command should use a colon to separate the user and group, so maybe it's D?
SH
Shenika
1 year ago
I think B is the right answer. The -u and -g options allow you to specify the user and group separately, which seems like it would work for this question.
DA
Daniel
1 year ago
Option D looks good to me. The chown command with the user and group separated by a colon is the standard way to change both the owner and group on a file.
FE
Felix
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know the chown command is used to change ownership, but I'm not sure about the exact syntax. I'll have to think this through carefully.
KA
Kami
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is D. The chown command takes the user and group separated by a colon, so that's the correct syntax.
ON
Oneida
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward NetSuite configuration question. I think the key is to focus on the specific settings needed to track defective items returned to vendors.
AR
Ardella
1 year ago
The Copy Artifact plugin sounds like the right answer to me. I've used that before to pull in files from a previous build, so that makes the most sense for this question.
IS
Isabella
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that it's not about determining the flow of a process. I feel like that's more for flowcharts instead.
ED
Edmond
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on the key differences between the two protocols and how that might impact the communication.
NI
Nieves
2 years ago
The colon is usually used to separate user and group, so I feel confident D) chown dave:staff data.txt is the correct answer.
NA
Narcisa
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's either A) chown dave/staff data.txt or D) chown dave:staff data.txt.
ST
Stefany
2 years ago
I agree with Nieves, D) chown dave:staff data.txt makes sense.
NI
Nieves
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) chown dave:staff data.txt.
FA
Farrah
2 years ago
I see your point, Chan, but I think specifying both user and group separately might not work.
CH
Chan
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) chown -u dave -g staff data.txt could also be correct.
HE
Hector
2 years ago
I agree with Farrah, using : to specify both user and group makes sense.
FA
Farrah
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) chown dave:staff data.txt.