New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM ISO27-13-001 Exam - Topic 8 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's ISO27-13-001 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 8
[All ISO27-13-001 Questions]

You are the lead auditor of the courier company SpeeDelivery. You have carried out a risk analysis and now want to determine your risk strategy. You decide to take measures for the large risks but not for the small risks.

What is this risk strategy called?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Armando
3 months ago
Just to clarify, risk bearing is the right term here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
3 months ago
I thought risk avoidance meant not taking any risks at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
3 months ago
Wait, are you sure it's not risk skipping? Sounds like it could be!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
4 months ago
Totally agree, that's definitely risk bearing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
4 months ago
It's called risk bearing when you take on large risks but ignore the small ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
4 months ago
I vaguely recall something about risk skipping, but it doesn't seem like a standard term. I think it's more about managing risks rather than ignoring them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
4 months ago
This sounds similar to a practice question I did about prioritizing risks. I think the answer could be risk neutral, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like risk avoidance would mean not taking any risks at all, which doesn't fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
5 months ago
I remember studying risk strategies, and I think this might be related to risk bearing since it involves accepting some risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
5 months ago
I've got this! The risk strategy they're describing is called risk bearing. You take measures for the big risks but not the small ones. I'm confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
5 months ago
I think the key is understanding the difference between the various risk management strategies. If they're only addressing the large risks, that sounds like a particular approach, but I'll need to double-check my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. They're talking about addressing large risks but not small ones. That sounds like a specific risk strategy, but I can't quite remember the term for it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about the terminology they're using. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward risk management question. I'm pretty confident I know the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different storage repository options. I'll need to review the Citrix documentation to understand the pros and cons of each one before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that 'w+' is the way to go here. It gives me the functionality I need to read, write, and create the file if necessary. The question is asking for a specific solution, and I think option C is the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
5 months ago
I'm unsure... could it be the sequence number? But that seems too low for a sequence number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
5 months ago
I remember a practice question similar to this one where we discussed the number of controllers needed for redundancy. It was a bit more complicated, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
9 months ago
I can't believe 'Risk skipping' is even an option. That's like the opposite of what a responsible auditor should do! I'm definitely choosing B.
upvoted 0 times
Allene
8 months ago
User 4: Yeah, that makes more sense for a responsible auditor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
8 months ago
User 3: I think the correct answer is B) Risk avoidance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
8 months ago
User 2: I agree, that doesn't sound responsible at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
9 months ago
User 1: I can't believe 'Risk skipping' is even an option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chan
10 months ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one! I'm torn between A and B, but I think I'll go with A, 'Risk bearing'. It just seems to fit the description better.
upvoted 0 times
Brittni
9 months ago
I think it's 'Risk bearing' too, it makes sense to focus on the large risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
9 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be 'Risk avoidance'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
9 months ago
I agree with you, I also think it's 'Risk bearing'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Phung
10 months ago
Haha, 'Risk skipping'? Really? That doesn't sound like a real risk strategy to me. I'm going with B, 'Risk avoidance'.
upvoted 0 times
Lucia
8 months ago
User 3: Definitely, better safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
9 months ago
User 2: I agree, it makes sense to avoid the big risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
9 months ago
User 1: I think the risk strategy is called 'Risk avoidance'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delsie
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I was thinking 'Risk avoidance' might be the correct answer, as it seems like the company is trying to avoid dealing with the smaller risks.
upvoted 0 times
Adolph
9 months ago
C) Risk neutral
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
9 months ago
B) Risk avoidance
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
9 months ago
D) Risk skipping
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
9 months ago
C) Risk neutral
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
9 months ago
B) Risk avoidance
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
10 months ago
A) Risk bearing
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
10 months ago
A) Risk bearing
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ettie
11 months ago
But if you only take measures for large risks and not for small risks, it's more about bearing the risk rather than avoiding it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barabara
11 months ago
I think option A, 'Risk bearing', sounds like the right choice here. It makes sense to take measures for the large risks but not the small ones.
upvoted 0 times
Caitlin
9 months ago
I think 'Risk bearing' is the most practical strategy for SpeeDelivery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
9 months ago
Risk avoidance doesn't seem like the right approach for our company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
10 months ago
I think we should focus on managing the big risks and not waste time on the small ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
10 months ago
I agree, option A, 'Risk bearing', is the best choice for our strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Toi
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Risk avoidance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Risk bearing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel