New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM ISO-IEC-LI Exam - Topic 2 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's ISO-IEC-LI exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 2
[All ISO-IEC-LI Questions]

It is allowed that employees and contractors are provided with an anonymous reporting channel to report violations of information security policies or procedures (''whistle blowing'')

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Geoffrey at Dec 10, 2022, 06:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-IEC-LI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Krystina
4 months ago
False. There are strict rules around this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
4 months ago
Wait, really? I didn't know that was allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
4 months ago
Totally agree, we need a safe way to speak up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
4 months ago
I thought it was illegal to report anonymously?
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
4 months ago
That's definitely true! Whistleblowing is important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
5 months ago
I studied that anonymous reporting is generally encouraged in many organizations, so I'm leaning towards true for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
5 months ago
I feel like this could be false, but I can't recall the specific policies that would prohibit it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
5 months ago
I remember a practice question about whistleblowing, and it mentioned that having an anonymous channel is a good practice for encouraging reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
5 months ago
I think it's true that employees can report violations anonymously, but I'm not completely sure if that applies to all types of violations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the X-style management is the perception that people need to seek responsibility, not that they need to be pushed or have their social needs met. That's the key distinction I remember from the lecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on configuration templates for scaling. I'm pretty confident I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
5 months ago
I feel like I've seen something similar in our discussions on GDPR. But I'm not clear if those requirements directly relate to 'Security by Design.' Maybe option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. Is it possible that the availability of the information could be in danger if the staff member is refusing to acknowledge the message? I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel