Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM ISO-31000-CLA Exam - Topic 7 Question 26 Discussion

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is considered to have a significant difference compared with traditional risk management approaches because ERM
B) takes an integrated or holistic approach.
A) ensures that an organisation's objectives will be achieved.
C) addresses strategic, tactical and operational risk management.

GAQM ISO-31000-CLA Exam - Topic 7 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's ISO-31000-CLA exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 7
[All ISO-31000-CLA Questions]

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is considered to have a significant difference compared with traditional risk management approaches because ERM

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

According to2, domain 1, ERM ''is a coordinated set of activities and methods that is used by organizations to manage risks across the enterprise''. It takes an integrated or holistic approach that considers all types of risks and their interrelationships across the organization's functions and levels.


by Marisha at Apr 08, 2026, 08:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-31000-CLA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Annabelle
2 hours ago
Good point! C shows the full picture of risk management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
5 days ago
C covers all bases. Strategic and operational are important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
10 days ago
True, but without integration, A might fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
16 days ago
A is also valid. Achieving objectives is crucial for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
21 days ago
I agree, B makes sense. It connects all risks together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
26 days ago
I think B is the best choice. Holistic approach is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
1 month ago
I’m not so sure about the effectiveness of ERM in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
1 month ago
It’s all about integration! Makes sense to tackle risks together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
1 month ago
Wait, can ERM really guarantee that objectives will be met?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
2 months ago
Totally agree! The holistic approach is a game changer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
2 months ago
ERM really does cover all bases, unlike traditional methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
2 months ago
I’m not so sure about the effectiveness of ERM in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
2 months ago
It’s all about integration! Makes sense to tackle risks together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
2 months ago
Wait, can ERM really guarantee that objectives will be met?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
4 months ago
Totally agree! The holistic approach is a game changer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
4 months ago
ERM really does cover all bases, unlike traditional methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that ERM is supposed to help achieve objectives, but I think the integrated approach is what sets it apart most clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
5 months ago
I feel like all three options could be part of ERM, but I’m uncertain which one really highlights the key difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luke
5 months ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized how ERM integrates various types of risks, so I lean towards option B being correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
5 months ago
I think ERM is more about the holistic approach, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main difference.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel