Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM ISO-31000-CLA Exam - Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's ISO-31000-CLA exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 1
[All ISO-31000-CLA Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Janna
1 day ago
I feel option A is too restrictive. Captives have more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
6 days ago
I lean towards B. Captives accessing reinsurance is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
11 days ago
No, that's a misconception. Captives can definitely offer more cover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
17 days ago
But isn't it true that a captive can act as a reinsurer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
22 days ago
Agreed, captives can access reinsurance markets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
27 days ago
I think option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
2 months ago
I thought captives had to be in the same country as their parent too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
2 months ago
Statement 1 is definitely incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
2 months ago
I disagree, a captive can act as a reinsurer in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
2 months ago
Captives can definitely access reinsurance markets!
upvoted 0 times
...
Amalia
2 months ago
C is the way to go. Who would've thought captives could be so versatile? I guess they're not just for the big guys anymore.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 months ago
I'm going with C. A captive can access reinsurance and sometimes provide better coverage than the regular insurance market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
3 months ago
The answer is C. 2 and 3 are correct statements about captive insurance companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about 1 and 4. Captives can act as reinsurers, and they don't have to be located in the same country as the parent company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
3 months ago
I recall a practice question where we discussed how captives can sometimes provide better coverage than traditional insurers, so statement 3 might be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like captives can act as reinsurers in some cases, which makes me question statement 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
3 months ago
I think I remember that captives can access reinsurance markets, so maybe statement 2 is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
3 months ago
I've got a good strategy here. I'll eliminate the options that don't seem right, then focus on the remaining choices and try to apply my knowledge of captive insurance companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between a captive acting as a reinsurer versus accessing reinsurance markets. I'll have to review that part again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
4 months ago
I think 2 and 3 are correct. A captive can definitely access reinsurance markets and sometimes offer better coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
4 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know captives can access reinsurance, so that rules out option A. And captives can sometimes offer better coverage than the regular market, so I think C is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
4 months ago
Surprised to see people think captives can't offer more cover than the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
4 months ago
Statement 4 seems off to me; I thought captives could be set up in different jurisdictions from their parent companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems tricky. I'm not sure about the reinsurance part - I'll have to think that through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident I can handle this one. The key is to focus on the differences between captive insurance companies and regular insurance companies.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel