MENU
You need to test that the rules have been correctly set up in the configuration table, according to the specification. Which one of the following test design techniques would be most suitable for this?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CTIL-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
KA
Katlyn
12 months ago
Data flow testing focuses on the movement of data, not rules.
RA
Raul
12 months ago
Wait, are we really sure decision table testing is the best choice?
PO
Portia
1 year ago
Not sure about that, boundary value analysis could also be useful.
AL
Allene
1 year ago
Totally agree, it covers all the rules effectively!
VE
Veda
1 year ago
I think decision table testing is the way to go for this.
KR
Kristine
1 year ago
Decision table testing sounds familiar, but I wonder if data flow testing could also apply in some way.
AL
Alita
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like statement testing focuses more on code coverage rather than rule validation.
BL
Blythe
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about boundary value analysis being useful for edge cases.
DE
Denna
1 year ago
I think decision table testing might be the right choice since it helps in validating rules and combinations.
JE
Jeannetta
1 year ago
Based on the requirements, I think option B using a custom object and custom REST API could be a good approach. That way we can tailor the integration to exactly what we need, while still minimizing custom code. The ETL piece will be key to keeping the data in sync between the systems.
SH
Sharmaine
1 year ago
Ah, I see now. Option D looks promising - using the force:hasSobjectName interface to get the context. I'll need to double-check the documentation on that, but I think that might be the best solution.