New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CTIL-001 Exam - Topic 6 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CTIL-001 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 6
[All CTIL-001 Questions]

You need to test that the rules have been correctly set up in the configuration table, according to the specification. Which one of the following test design techniques would be most suitable for this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Merissa at May 07, 2022, 02:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTIL-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Katlyn
4 months ago
Data flow testing focuses on the movement of data, not rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
4 months ago
Wait, are we really sure decision table testing is the best choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
4 months ago
Not sure about that, boundary value analysis could also be useful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
4 months ago
Totally agree, it covers all the rules effectively!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
5 months ago
I think decision table testing is the way to go for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
5 months ago
Decision table testing sounds familiar, but I wonder if data flow testing could also apply in some way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like statement testing focuses more on code coverage rather than rule validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about boundary value analysis being useful for edge cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
5 months ago
I think decision table testing might be the right choice since it helps in validating rules and combinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
5 months ago
Based on the requirements, I think option B using a custom object and custom REST API could be a good approach. That way we can tailor the integration to exactly what we need, while still minimizing custom code. The ETL piece will be key to keeping the data in sync between the systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
5 months ago
Ah, I see now. Option D looks promising - using the force:hasSobjectName interface to get the context. I'll need to double-check the documentation on that, but I think that might be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel