New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CPEH-001 Exam - Topic 4 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CPEH-001 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 4
[All CPEH-001 Questions]

What does ICMP (type 11, code 0) denote?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Renea at May 05, 2022, 12:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPEH-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nguyet
4 months ago
Nah, it's not A, that's for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
4 months ago
I remember it being Destination Unreachable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
4 months ago
Wait, is it really C? I thought it was something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
4 months ago
Agreed, C is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
5 months ago
It's definitely Time Exceeded!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
5 months ago
I feel like I saw something about type 11 in my notes, but I can't recall if it was source quench or time exceeded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
5 months ago
I have a vague memory of type 11 being linked to time exceeded, but I could be mixing it up with another type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about ICMP messages, and I think type 11 was definitely about destination unreachable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
5 months ago
I think ICMP type 11 is related to time issues, but I'm not completely sure if it's specifically about time exceeded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the control plane and worker/compute machines. I'll need to review that before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
5 months ago
I'm a bit stumped on this one. The options all seem plausible, but I'm not sure which one is the MOST probable. I'll need to think it through carefully and try to eliminate the less likely scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the answer might be in the order type and the individual internal order master data, but I'm not totally sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
5 months ago
Definitely going to eliminate the 'Preemption' and 'De novo' options right away. Those don't match the description.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel