MENU
A company is legally liable for the content of email that is sent from its systems, regardless of whether the message was sent for private or business-related purposes. This could lead to prosecution for the sender and for the company's directors if, for example, outgoing email was found to contain material that was pornographic, racist, or likely to incite someone to commit an act of terrorism. You can always defend yourself by "ignorance of the law" clause.
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CPEH-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
System Key hotfix is an optional feature which allows stronger encryption of SAM. Strong encryption protects private account information by encrypting the password data using a 128-bit cryptographically random key, known as a password encryption key.
30 comments · newest first
KA
Kanisha
11 months ago
Just another reason to double-check what you send!
DA
Danica
11 months ago
Sounds a bit extreme, are they really prosecuting for this?
EL
Elfriede
11 months ago
Wait, really? I thought personal emails were off the hook.
CE
Celestine
12 months ago
Totally agree, ignorance of the law isn't a solid defense!
GE
Georgene
12 months ago
That's true, companies can be held liable for employee emails.
CA
Callie
12 months ago
I definitely remember that companies are responsible for their email content, but I can't recall if there's any leeway with the "ignorance of the law" defense.
IS
Isaiah
1 year ago
I feel like this is a tricky one. I want to say it's false because ignorance of the law usually doesn't protect you from liability, but I could be wrong.
TR
Trinidad
1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question in class, and I recall that the company can still be prosecuted even if the sender didn't know the content was illegal.
IR
Ira
1 year ago
I remember discussing how companies can be held liable for employee actions, but I'm not sure if "ignorance of the law" is a valid defense in these cases.
AU
Augustine
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The question clearly states that the company is legally liable for the content of emails sent from its systems, regardless of whether they're for private or business purposes. The "ignorance of the law" clause doesn't provide a valid defense. The answer is A - true.
AL
Alysa
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. The question seems to be contradictory, with the first part saying the company is liable, and the last part mentioning the "ignorance of the law" clause. I'm not sure which part takes precedence. I'll have to review the material again before answering.
TA
Taryn
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that the company is legally liable for the content of emails sent from its systems, even if they're for private purposes. The "ignorance of the law" clause doesn't apply here, so the correct answer is A - true.
BE
Beula
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question mentions that the company could be prosecuted if the emails contain certain types of content, but it also says you can always defend yourself with the "ignorance of the law" clause. I'll have to think this through carefully.
BE
Bev
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward - the company is legally liable for the content of emails sent from its systems, regardless of whether the emails were for private or business purposes. The "ignorance of the law" clause doesn't seem like a valid defense.
HI
Hillary
1 year ago
Revenue-sharing contract could be an interesting option. By aligning incentives across the supply chain, companies might be better able to coordinate and support each other when rare problems arise.
AN
Annabelle
1 year ago
Quick strategy: 30% of investment at 15% and 70% at 12%. Just multiply and add those percentages together.
DO
Dortha
2 years ago
This question is a bit of a minefield. I better brush up on my email etiquette before taking this exam!
PH
Phil
1 year ago
B) false
WI
William
1 year ago
I agree, it's important to be aware of the legal implications of email communication.
TR
Tresa
1 year ago
A) true
EL
Elli
2 years ago
Haha, 'ignorance of the law' - that's a good one! I'll be sure to try that if I ever get caught sending racist emails from the office.
AN
Annette
2 years ago
No way, the 'ignorance of the law' clause should protect the company. How can they be expected to police every single email that goes out?
LI
Linsey
2 years ago
I think it's true because companies are responsible for what is sent from their systems.
IZ
Izetta
2 years ago
B) false
JU
Judy
2 years ago
This is a tricky one. I think the company should be held liable, as they have a responsibility to monitor and control the content of emails sent from their systems, regardless of the purpose.
AL
Alaine
1 year ago
I think it's important for companies to take responsibility for the content of emails sent from their systems.
CA
Casie
1 year ago
B) false
BU
Buddy
1 year ago
I agree, the company should be held liable for the content of emails sent from their systems.
LO
Lottie
1 year ago
A) true
LI
Linsey
2 years ago
A) true