Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM CPEH-001 Exam - Topic 2 Question 13 Discussion

Posted by Alishia on May 08, 2022 at 06:28 PM

Basically, there are two approaches to network intrusion detection: signature detection, and anomaly detection. The signature detection approach utilizes well-known signatures for network traffic to identify potentially malicious traffic. The anomaly detection approach utilizes a previous history of network traffic to search for patterns that are abnormal, which would indicate an intrusion. How can an attacker disguise his buffer overflow attack signature such that there is a greater probability of his attack going undetected by the IDS?

Suggested Answer: D

ADMmutate is using a polymorphic technique designed to circumvent certain forms of signature based intrusion detection. All network based remote buffer overflow exploits have similarities in how they function. ADMmutate has the ability to emulate the protocol of the service the attacker is attempting to exploit. The data payload (sometimes referred to as an egg) contains the instructions the attacker wants to execute on the target machine. These eggs are generally interchangeable and can be utilized in many different buffer overflow exploits. ADMmutate uses several techniques to randomize the contents of the egg in any given buffer overflow exploit. This randomization effectively changes the content or 'signature' of the exploit without changing the functionality of the exploit.


Get Premium CPEH-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
MO
Mollie 12 months ago
Signature detection is outdated; anomaly detection is where it's at!
DO
Domitila 12 months ago
Wait, can you really change the signature with tools like ADMmutate? Sounds too good to be true!
DO
Dorethea 1 year ago
NOOP sleds can be effective, but they aren't foolproof.
VE
Veronika 1 year ago
I think using a dynamic return address is pretty risky though.
MI
Miss 1 year ago
Polymorphic shell code is definitely a game changer for evading detection.
NU
Nu 1 year ago
I have a vague memory of shellcode techniques, but I can't recall if using a reverse telnet would really help with evasion. It seems too obvious.
EU
Eulah 1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think chaining NOOP instructions could be effective too. But I'm leaning towards option D for the signature change.
LE
Leatha 1 year ago
I remember studying how polymorphic shellcode can change its appearance to evade detection. I think option D might be the right choice.
CO
Corrie 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like using a dynamic return address could also help in disguising the attack. It seems like it could confuse the IDS.
NI
Nichelle 1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not super familiar with the details of Facebook ad metrics, so I'm a bit confused about the best way to approach this. I'll try to eliminate the options that don't seem quite right, and then make an educated guess.
LE
Leota 1 year ago
This question is testing my knowledge of Python's object model. I'll need to double-check the syntax and behavior to make sure I get this right.
LE
Lenny 1 year ago
This question seems to be testing our understanding of different decision-making strategies. I think the key is to identify the specific de-biasing strategy used by the threat intelligence manager to resolve the competing hypotheses.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel